{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW","short_pith_number":"pith:R4ICOZKZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8f102765590518c61fc3af6f80ba550d9262c4e000bc39dcd5fe8bbe5d1b8d29","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2005.13407","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amir Feder, Nadav Oved, Roi Reichart, Uri Shalit","submitted_at":"2020-05-27T15:06:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding predictions made by deep neural networks is notoriously difficult, but also crucial to their dissemination. As all machine learning based methods, they are as good as their training data, and can also capture unwanted biases. While there are tools that can help understand whether such biases exist, they do not distinguish between correlation and causation, and might be ill-suited for text-based models and for reasoning about high level language concepts. A key problem of estimating the causal effect of a concept of interest on a given model is that this estimation requires the ge"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2005.13407","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-05-27T15:06:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"1453f66bff5d6b680a03775cea804ed2bfabddacb1b4c0775608320a59d0a578","abstract_canon_sha256":"b8981ab0562be3a23e85e80386940ef373b1a43c5a1192ffdcdc9d0a7c8ba2b1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350467Z","signature_b64":"9rJCSVDJEtGkoTxmmJ/HMmjpxPJxUZYH+GJlRYBPxT/2jUDQHIW1e+3nkpMsc+tdA+YzSNhgPZpzWVDlXjHBBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8f102765590518c61fc3af6f80ba550d9262c4e000bc39dcd5fe8bbe5d1b8d29","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.349964Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.349964Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amir Feder, Nadav Oved, Roi Reichart, Uri Shalit","submitted_at":"2020-05-27T15:06:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding predictions made by deep neural networks is notoriously difficult, but also crucial to their dissemination. As all machine learning based methods, they are as good as their training data, and can also capture unwanted biases. While there are tools that can help understand whether such biases exist, they do not distinguish between correlation and causation, and might be ill-suited for text-based models and for reasoning about high level language concepts. A key problem of estimating the causal effect of a concept of interest on a given model is that this estimation requires the ge"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2005.13407","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2005.13407/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2005.13407","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2005.13407v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.13407","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"R4ICOZKZAUMM","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6D","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"R4ICOZKZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25891","citing_title":"Causal Tongue-Tie: LLMs Can Encode Causal Direction, But Their Yes/No Outputs Fail to Express","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R4ICOZKZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R4ICOZKZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2005.13407&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/R4ICOZKZAUMMMH6DV5XYBOSVBW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:15:21.350024+00:00"}