{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5","short_pith_number":"pith:R5SWKIN3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8f656521bb9669e189b9a8b6529b1f4f4b4d99f468aec96c81eba7a34d27e098","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.04446","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How Dataflow Diagrams Impact Software Security Analysis: an Empirical Experiment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Georg Simhandl, Nicol\\'as E. D\\'iaz Ferreyra, Pierre-Jean Qu\\'eval, Riccardo Scandariato, Simon Schneider, Uwe Zdun","submitted_at":"2024-01-09T09:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Models of software systems are used throughout the software development lifecycle. Dataflow diagrams (DFDs), in particular, are well-established resources for security analysis. Many techniques, such as threat modelling, are based on DFDs of the analysed application. However, their impact on the performance of analysts in a security analysis setting has not been explored before. In this paper, we present the findings of an empirical experiment conducted to investigate this effect. Following a within-groups design, participants were asked to solve security-relevant tasks for a given microservic"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.04446","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-01-09T09:22:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1ae3ecf3e7ec38778df14a127a6d9d08286e657cd7928c3037089846690c6e1a","abstract_canon_sha256":"67914135336a2f1b3d1844f90b4884184406f22f75a827de8ed141e3dd83f9fd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.283204Z","signature_b64":"42z37Yma9MBlTN3jgQuy06723pI/pPt+8QPxG1dvy/TMAKLLU+4Zmg83vm6UdkRmfqhTlbDy0JiD90rdr9S2AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8f656521bb9669e189b9a8b6529b1f4f4b4d99f468aec96c81eba7a34d27e098","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282834Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282834Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How Dataflow Diagrams Impact Software Security Analysis: an Empirical Experiment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Georg Simhandl, Nicol\\'as E. D\\'iaz Ferreyra, Pierre-Jean Qu\\'eval, Riccardo Scandariato, Simon Schneider, Uwe Zdun","submitted_at":"2024-01-09T09:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Models of software systems are used throughout the software development lifecycle. Dataflow diagrams (DFDs), in particular, are well-established resources for security analysis. Many techniques, such as threat modelling, are based on DFDs of the analysed application. However, their impact on the performance of analysts in a security analysis setting has not been explored before. In this paper, we present the findings of an empirical experiment conducted to investigate this effect. Following a within-groups design, participants were asked to solve security-relevant tasks for a given microservic"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.04446","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.04446/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.04446","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.04446v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.04446","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"R5SWKIN3SZU6","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"R5SWKIN3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.18369","citing_title":"ThreMoLIA: Threat Modeling of Large Language Model-Integrated Applications","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R5SWKIN3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/R5SWKIN3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.04446&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/R5SWKIN3SZU6DCNZVC3FFGY7J5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:31:44.282889+00:00"}