{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE","short_pith_number":"pith:RACJ36QT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"88049dfa133051a62a977baf61301b090d6d9bba0a3389a89911247cd9d999aa","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2201.11607","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Gabriele Veneziano, Gregory A. Vilkovisky","submitted_at":"2022-01-27T16:06:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, Damour computed the radiation reaction on gravitational scattering as the (linear) response to the angular momentum loss which he found to be of ${\\cal O}(G^2)$ in the gravitational constant. This is a puzzle because any amplitude calculation would produce both energy and angular momentum losses starting only at ${\\cal O}(G^3)$. Another puzzle is that the resultant radiation reaction, of ${\\cal O}(G^3)$, is nevertheless correct and confirmed by a number of direct calculations. We ascribe these puzzles to the BMS ambiguity in defining angular momentum. The loss of angular momentum is "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2201.11607","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2022-01-27T16:06:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"b4e872fb4233fdbfd0d3b57d9913b77f841108c17071a7e579708846c55f178e","abstract_canon_sha256":"510e66cd68f16ba8a2367b55febdf01a1c5ba7f8444d34bd293591fa0ea177d7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569618Z","signature_b64":"OnbGvRZV2JmN7qRfprowEx3JKxW9rwXTSW3U5HVsaX1HpY+mdz53i9qD0ggf7snkXnlal7kZMpR9ZyQ7i4ckBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"88049dfa133051a62a977baf61301b090d6d9bba0a3389a89911247cd9d999aa","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569124Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569124Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Gabriele Veneziano, Gregory A. Vilkovisky","submitted_at":"2022-01-27T16:06:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, Damour computed the radiation reaction on gravitational scattering as the (linear) response to the angular momentum loss which he found to be of ${\\cal O}(G^2)$ in the gravitational constant. This is a puzzle because any amplitude calculation would produce both energy and angular momentum losses starting only at ${\\cal O}(G^3)$. Another puzzle is that the resultant radiation reaction, of ${\\cal O}(G^3)$, is nevertheless correct and confirmed by a number of direct calculations. We ascribe these puzzles to the BMS ambiguity in defining angular momentum. The loss of angular momentum is "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2201.11607","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2201.11607/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2201.11607","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2201.11607v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2201.11607","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RACJ36QTGBI2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RACJ36QTGBI2MKUX","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RACJ36QT","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11423","citing_title":"Weak-field waveforms for generic relativistic orbits","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2406.02815","citing_title":"Frames and Slicings for Angular Momentum in Post-Minkowski Scattering","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12214","citing_title":"A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RACJ36QT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RACJ36QT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2201.11607&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RACJ36QTGBI2MKUXPOXWCMA3BE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:54:50.569183+00:00"}