{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB","short_pith_number":"pith:RAMITTA6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"881889cc1e65c7e8f91774d168f751006563c3344f83e302a3c3f9fe1a93908b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.11042","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anne Lauscher, Iryna Gurevych, Lizhen Qu, Sukannya Purkayastha, Zhuang Li","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T10:07:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer review is a cornerstone of quality control in scientific publishing. With the increasing workload, the unintended use of `quick' heuristics, referred to as lazy thinking, has emerged as a recurring issue compromising review quality. Automated methods to detect such heuristics can help improve the peer-reviewing process. However, there is limited NLP research on this issue, and no real-world dataset exists to support the development of detection tools. This work introduces LazyReview, a dataset of peer-review sentences annotated with fine-grained lazy thinking categories. Our analysis reve"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.11042","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T10:07:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2073e09eef2e5913e1a3028dfa1e880edef7ead3e5e5058444816891b95f0cca","abstract_canon_sha256":"4b86c2001304f7b5a7a3a9dbd84912ee789a5c1cf0e3d1007bc4a391653064da"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.245387Z","signature_b64":"6IWJy3pmXjsp56ZsqF28lyFEo34fhCZ+nx8NqiUq0pzkLVNtvJlqQpHi22Yet6VuS7rJQIIiJhJfI/uOVTBTDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"881889cc1e65c7e8f91774d168f751006563c3344f83e302a3c3f9fe1a93908b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244761Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244761Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anne Lauscher, Iryna Gurevych, Lizhen Qu, Sukannya Purkayastha, Zhuang Li","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T10:07:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Peer review is a cornerstone of quality control in scientific publishing. With the increasing workload, the unintended use of `quick' heuristics, referred to as lazy thinking, has emerged as a recurring issue compromising review quality. Automated methods to detect such heuristics can help improve the peer-reviewing process. However, there is limited NLP research on this issue, and no real-world dataset exists to support the development of detection tools. This work introduces LazyReview, a dataset of peer-review sentences annotated with fine-grained lazy thinking categories. Our analysis reve"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.11042","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.11042/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.11042","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.11042v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.11042","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RAMITTA6MXD6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RAMITTA6MXD6R6IX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RAMITTA6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24071","citing_title":"PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RAMITTA6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RAMITTA6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.11042&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RAMITTA6MXD6R6IXOTIWR52RAB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:58.244863+00:00"}