{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F","short_pith_number":"pith:RB3AS5RV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8876097635178dc92dde2c8bf2683de15ce397a98efe71cea10cfcda624023c7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.01007","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Assaf Toledo, Dan Lahav, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Elad Venezian, Michal Jacovi, Noam Slonim, Ranit Aharonov, Roni Friedman, Shai Gretz","submitted_at":"2019-09-03T09:00:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore the task of automatic assessment of argument quality. To that end, we actively collected 6.3k arguments, more than a factor of five compared to previously examined data. Each argument was explicitly and carefully annotated for its quality. In addition, 14k pairs of arguments were annotated independently, identifying the higher quality argument in each pair. In spite of the inherent subjective nature of the task, both annotation schemes led to surprisingly consistent results. We release the labeled datasets to the community. Furthermore, we suggest neural methods based on a recently "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.01007","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2019-09-03T09:00:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e26aaf9669bf9b7bbb250233450989d8584096a21c41c863061a55f3ada02c2f","abstract_canon_sha256":"50c2377637607fd72640b62880ee838552f50b19036afdc3c19deb5ce7eba028"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969694Z","signature_b64":"HqAkqVe+aohEc6S1XxN8/UdfgH1hjiq+iZIK8mryNkqYtmjJaTS6zGk6y2g0o3+7KX8WsUMwdhyPL49vb8bOCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8876097635178dc92dde2c8bf2683de15ce397a98efe71cea10cfcda624023c7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969286Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969286Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Assaf Toledo, Dan Lahav, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Elad Venezian, Michal Jacovi, Noam Slonim, Ranit Aharonov, Roni Friedman, Shai Gretz","submitted_at":"2019-09-03T09:00:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"We explore the task of automatic assessment of argument quality. To that end, we actively collected 6.3k arguments, more than a factor of five compared to previously examined data. Each argument was explicitly and carefully annotated for its quality. In addition, 14k pairs of arguments were annotated independently, identifying the higher quality argument in each pair. In spite of the inherent subjective nature of the task, both annotation schemes led to surprisingly consistent results. We release the labeled datasets to the community. Furthermore, we suggest neural methods based on a recently "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.01007","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.01007/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.01007","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.01007v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.01007","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RB3AS5RVC6G4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RB3AS5RV","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19141","citing_title":"GRASP: Deterministic argument ranking in interaction graphs","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RB3AS5RV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RB3AS5RV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.01007&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RB3AS5RVC6G4SLO6FSF7E2B54F/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:14.969361+00:00"}