{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V","short_pith_number":"pith:RCON2TZC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"889cdd4f2260d2eb98cee67582ef95d579af2a3f5d8a242936d76d2bb1e0c7e6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.06710","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Wenhu Chen","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T04:08:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent literature has shown that large language models (LLMs) are generally excellent few-shot reasoners to solve text reasoning tasks. However, the capability of LLMs on table reasoning tasks is yet to be explored. In this paper, we aim at understanding how well LLMs can perform table-related tasks with few-shot in-context learning. Specifically, we evaluated LLMs on popular table QA and fact verification datasets like WikiTableQuestion, FetaQA, TabFact, and FEVEROUS and found that LLMs are competent at complex reasoning over table structures, though these models are not pre-trained on any ta"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.06710","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T04:08:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ace6430fbe1a0c01c4dc36caf26bf64b6e6616a999587e0a22d210e2190a0977","abstract_canon_sha256":"adada01bd154902498a0e475ce06f9d5f7d6ad1f52d3edb41359fd85938911fe"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768625Z","signature_b64":"PiG+4S4u8Z49fWf4GlVpFsS4O1q3hyGglgjORiDjqfN+VgpRGdQB2qalEorKieAa6E2UJJSGTEEPL//ZnzuKBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"889cdd4f2260d2eb98cee67582ef95d579af2a3f5d8a242936d76d2bb1e0c7e6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768087Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768087Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Wenhu Chen","submitted_at":"2022-10-13T04:08:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent literature has shown that large language models (LLMs) are generally excellent few-shot reasoners to solve text reasoning tasks. However, the capability of LLMs on table reasoning tasks is yet to be explored. In this paper, we aim at understanding how well LLMs can perform table-related tasks with few-shot in-context learning. Specifically, we evaluated LLMs on popular table QA and fact verification datasets like WikiTableQuestion, FetaQA, TabFact, and FEVEROUS and found that LLMs are competent at complex reasoning over table structures, though these models are not pre-trained on any ta"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.06710","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.06710/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.06710","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.06710v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.06710","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RCON2TZCMDJO","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RCON2TZC","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.16616","citing_title":"LDI: Localized Data Imputation for Text-Rich Tables","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21495","citing_title":"Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RCON2TZC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RCON2TZC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.06710&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RCON2TZCMDJOXGGO4Z2YF34V2V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:34:49.768144+00:00"}