{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77","short_pith_number":"pith:RDHCWN2L","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"88ce2b374bfdc7f17d9188d9165771fff071de19b2c116fb20688b0ef37a3ae4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2103.04576","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Ushak Rahaman","submitted_at":"2021-03-08T07:09:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we have analysed the latest data from NO$\\nu$A and T2K with the Lorentz invariance violation along with the standard oscillation hypothesis. We have found that the NO$\\nu$A data cannot distinguish between the two hypotheses at $1\\, \\sigma$ confidence level. T2K data and the combined data analysis excluded standard oscillation at $1\\, \\sigma$. All three cases do not have any hierarchy sensitivity when analysed with LIV. There is a mild tension between the two experiments, when analysed with LIV, as $\\theta_{23}$ at \\nova best-fit is at higher octant but the same for T2K is at low"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2103.04576","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2021-03-08T07:09:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"8327dc83bb21dfd17868a7f163e28002f3254a2a135168660c3e74f1aa902a37","abstract_canon_sha256":"592ec48915253143b0f33298763f78e98206635db555c37c451d9de05d7b3eae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.202239Z","signature_b64":"nryDlCInW8uxPVzgfe2e/n530m95azONOnSsLSQlALQsbsqzj2bWwnLnKze7foIhEhd3TEOj6WDxh1Fqin66Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"88ce2b374bfdc7f17d9188d9165771fff071de19b2c116fb20688b0ef37a3ae4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201735Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201735Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Ushak Rahaman","submitted_at":"2021-03-08T07:09:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we have analysed the latest data from NO$\\nu$A and T2K with the Lorentz invariance violation along with the standard oscillation hypothesis. We have found that the NO$\\nu$A data cannot distinguish between the two hypotheses at $1\\, \\sigma$ confidence level. T2K data and the combined data analysis excluded standard oscillation at $1\\, \\sigma$. All three cases do not have any hierarchy sensitivity when analysed with LIV. There is a mild tension between the two experiments, when analysed with LIV, as $\\theta_{23}$ at \\nova best-fit is at higher octant but the same for T2K is at low"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2103.04576","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2103.04576/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2103.04576","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2103.04576v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2103.04576","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RDHCWN2L7XD7","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RDHCWN2L","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06513","citing_title":"Interplay of CPT-Violating and CPT-Conserving Lorentz Invariance Violation at DUNE","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31996","citing_title":"Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics","ref_index":84,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2312.11704","citing_title":"Ultralight dark matter in long-baseline accelerator neutrino oscillations","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.00146","citing_title":"Update on non-unitary mixing in the recent NO$\\nu$A and T2K data","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.16124","citing_title":"Effects of tau-neutrino detection on non-standard interactions at DUNE with a short discussion on the nature of neutrino mixing","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RDHCWN2L"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RDHCWN2L","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2103.04576&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RDHCWN2L7XD7C7MRRDMRMV3R77/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:43:45.201795+00:00"}