{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB","short_pith_number":"pith:RDT2H44R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"88e7a3f3910685500fa26f688c924da05b32feea63a5b01c9d3afa8cd4e609f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.06008","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Token Signature: Predicting Chain-of-Thought Gains with Token Decoding Feature in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengli Xu, Peijie Liu, Yong Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T11:53:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-Thought (CoT) technique has proven effective in improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks. However, the performance gains are inconsistent across different tasks, and the underlying mechanism remains a long-standing research question. In this work, we make a preliminary observation that the monotonicity of token probability distributions may be correlated with the gains achieved through CoT reasoning. Leveraging this insight, we propose two indicators based on the token probability distribution to assess CoT effectiveness across different tas"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.06008","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T11:53:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"07dfc8fe51b379cd83e6f8e836eb650dd1712eb8e997b3f8ea724da58ad33307","abstract_canon_sha256":"92b0f20af6a5115b0715562667e8f13fabae1a392bf168a70cca262eff698314"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526911Z","signature_b64":"MFOGT5mzhT+eHRGGrYYs33QRx6kQ5qzPRMmzUrOpe2vb2YSailJwEK1pbZH6rLYkRYdv9XYBlkEuSFk9S4XlDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"88e7a3f3910685500fa26f688c924da05b32feea63a5b01c9d3afa8cd4e609f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526424Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526424Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Token Signature: Predicting Chain-of-Thought Gains with Token Decoding Feature in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengli Xu, Peijie Liu, Yong Li","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T11:53:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-Thought (CoT) technique has proven effective in improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks. However, the performance gains are inconsistent across different tasks, and the underlying mechanism remains a long-standing research question. In this work, we make a preliminary observation that the monotonicity of token probability distributions may be correlated with the gains achieved through CoT reasoning. Leveraging this insight, we propose two indicators based on the token probability distribution to assess CoT effectiveness across different tas"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.06008","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.06008/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.06008","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.06008v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.06008","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RDT2H44RA2CV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RDT2H44RA2CVAD5C","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RDT2H44R","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06192","citing_title":"The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: Why are Entropy Dynamics and Reasoning Correlated in LLMs?","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RDT2H44R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RDT2H44R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.06008&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RDT2H44RA2CVAD5CN5UIZESNUB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:14.526484+00:00"}