{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W","short_pith_number":"pith:REABX75Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"89001bffb8909cd018c2ceae0ec12ffda06cf497df399b7ddf992cfc9edafe82","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.05990","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT","cs.LG","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Alfonso Amayuelas, Fei Sun, Julie Chen, Lingyao Li, Lizhou Fan, Lucas Jiang, Mingyu Jin, Ollie Liu, Wenyue Hua, William Wang, Xintong Wang, Yongfeng Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-11-08T22:02:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the rationality of large language models (LLMs) in strategic decision-making contexts, specifically within the framework of game theory. We evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs across a spectrum of complete-information and incomplete-information games. Our findings reveal that LLMs frequently deviate from rational strategies, particularly as the complexity of the game increases with larger payoff matrices or deeper sequential trees.\n  To address these limitations, we design multiple game-theoretic workflows that guide the reasoning and decision-making processes of LLM"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.05990","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-11-08T22:02:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.GT","cs.LG","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"7b6542db2dec9c147e8f7afd38061cd1fbb841c40af5929ffae542b5118b2551","abstract_canon_sha256":"6a5b13aa3636e0cccba18961d8371f06c1697116df70e82feb4f2f145675271e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540559Z","signature_b64":"CmoQlfveu1VoOtVCkTPDg5h1LiSMwWdw8ZpWIzP0dInW9/Kwst4OzfTQBOAuKtOuiLsai+e3KtKOxdtYRA5vBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"89001bffb8909cd018c2ceae0ec12ffda06cf497df399b7ddf992cfc9edafe82","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540003Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540003Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT","cs.LG","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Alfonso Amayuelas, Fei Sun, Julie Chen, Lingyao Li, Lizhou Fan, Lucas Jiang, Mingyu Jin, Ollie Liu, Wenyue Hua, William Wang, Xintong Wang, Yongfeng Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-11-08T22:02:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the rationality of large language models (LLMs) in strategic decision-making contexts, specifically within the framework of game theory. We evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs across a spectrum of complete-information and incomplete-information games. Our findings reveal that LLMs frequently deviate from rational strategies, particularly as the complexity of the game increases with larger payoff matrices or deeper sequential trees.\n  To address these limitations, we design multiple game-theoretic workflows that guide the reasoning and decision-making processes of LLM"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.05990","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.05990/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.05990","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.05990v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.05990","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"REABX75YSCON","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"REABX75YSCONAGGC","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"REABX75Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22748","citing_title":"Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.21783","citing_title":"NetworkGames: Simulating Cooperation in Network Games with Personality-driven LLM Agents","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13875","citing_title":"Common-agency Games for Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00487","citing_title":"Competition and Cooperation of LLM Agents in Games","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22748","citing_title":"Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.12127","citing_title":"BLAST: Blockchain-based LLM-powered Agentic Spectrum Trading","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/REABX75Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/REABX75Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.05990&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/REABX75YSCONAGGCZ2XA5QJP7W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:34:22.540074+00:00"}