{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE","short_pith_number":"pith:REZTMKEX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8933362897e660a5dc45e8f6b0de15591d5050d4541a0f1cc05b41bdad52c237","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2306.05153","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is AI the better programming partner? Human-Human Pair Programming vs. Human-AI pAIr Programming","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Kenneth Koedinger, Qianou Ma, Tongshuang Wu","submitted_at":"2023-06-08T12:22:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergence of large-language models (LLMs) that excel at code generation and commercial products such as GitHub's Copilot has sparked interest in human-AI pair programming (referred to as \"pAIr programming\") where an AI system collaborates with a human programmer. While traditional pair programming between humans has been extensively studied, it remains uncertain whether its findings can be applied to human-AI pair programming. We compare human-human and human-AI pair programming, exploring their similarities and differences in interaction, measures, benefits, and challenges. We find that t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2306.05153","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2023-06-08T12:22:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"79d81d1ccec8e2ac88fc4c5ab2b7f90ddc4a19bbed58c493bffb8d8c05efbdd7","abstract_canon_sha256":"af6047106f369a0f6f7da66c222f4456359d950f2274b08b2ba905d4ec02c490"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.795045Z","signature_b64":"VylpkK9+VtgN/JTs4DtxfnxGZFmlCcuNIO4efDuRXwfAInZgROsVsHY7a69GSPyoBG5P7u41dkfSd1klwf1XCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8933362897e660a5dc45e8f6b0de15591d5050d4541a0f1cc05b41bdad52c237","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794560Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794560Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is AI the better programming partner? Human-Human Pair Programming vs. Human-AI pAIr Programming","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Kenneth Koedinger, Qianou Ma, Tongshuang Wu","submitted_at":"2023-06-08T12:22:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"The emergence of large-language models (LLMs) that excel at code generation and commercial products such as GitHub's Copilot has sparked interest in human-AI pair programming (referred to as \"pAIr programming\") where an AI system collaborates with a human programmer. While traditional pair programming between humans has been extensively studied, it remains uncertain whether its findings can be applied to human-AI pair programming. We compare human-human and human-AI pair programming, exploring their similarities and differences in interaction, measures, benefits, and challenges. We find that t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2306.05153","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2306.05153/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2306.05153","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2306.05153v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.05153","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"REZTMKEX4ZQK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"REZTMKEX","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08807","citing_title":"A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04273","citing_title":"Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05836","citing_title":"Can providing feedback on gaze and mental-effort synchrony improve pair programming performance?","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16213","citing_title":"Investigating Conversational Agents to Support Secondary School Students Learning CSP","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18948","citing_title":"Relationships Between Trust, Compliance, and Performance for Novice Programmers Using AI Code Generation","ref_index":186,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01104","citing_title":"RECAP: An End-to-End Platform for Capturing, Replaying, and Analyzing AI-Assisted Programming Interactions","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/REZTMKEX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/REZTMKEX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2306.05153&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/REZTMKEX4ZQKLXCF5D3LBXQVLE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:05.794614+00:00"}