{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY","short_pith_number":"pith:RFFJLXAM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"894a95dc0c4a927480ba5820978c95062429c368db7be3d52b20313aa94d2036","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.22667","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Imperfect Commitment in Maximal Extractable Value Auctions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Aleksei Adadurov, Andrei Sebyakin, Antero Eloranta, Anton Chtepine, Arsenii Valitov, Sergey Barseghyan","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T16:08:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ethereum block builders run sealed auctions among searchers, but nothing in the protocol forces a builder to honor the auction outcome after observing submitted bundles. This paper studies the commitment problem. We model a builder who defects with probability $\\varepsilon$ and, upon defection, replicates a type-specific fraction $\\gamma(\\tau)$ of the winning MEV opportunity. Searchers anticipate this behavior and choose between a risky first-price bid and a safe deterrence bid that makes frontrunning unprofitable. The resulting equilibrium is piecewise, with the cost of imperfect commitment d"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.22667","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T16:08:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.TR"],"title_canon_sha256":"85d343e9615656562f4132ab4613fa7d4cf72f8f7201c54d1d978ed8bbaa50e3","abstract_canon_sha256":"61f467ebb483d4f8992ea8f8433015478e7d731e8489b86b4644cc6437fc6a74"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.281576Z","signature_b64":"9G26Cms0ESWL50XmsmIbMtBnxLiesT10Y+G/4A2GPc8L1esn2mFzNEvLfh0PBs7F5SZhdOnvEWLc2414Wda1CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"894a95dc0c4a927480ba5820978c95062429c368db7be3d52b20313aa94d2036","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280753Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280753Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Imperfect Commitment in Maximal Extractable Value Auctions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Aleksei Adadurov, Andrei Sebyakin, Antero Eloranta, Anton Chtepine, Arsenii Valitov, Sergey Barseghyan","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T16:08:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ethereum block builders run sealed auctions among searchers, but nothing in the protocol forces a builder to honor the auction outcome after observing submitted bundles. This paper studies the commitment problem. We model a builder who defects with probability $\\varepsilon$ and, upon defection, replicates a type-specific fraction $\\gamma(\\tau)$ of the winning MEV opportunity. Searchers anticipate this behavior and choose between a risky first-price bid and a safe deterrence bid that makes frontrunning unprofitable. The resulting equilibrium is piecewise, with the cost of imperfect commitment d"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.22667","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.22667/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.22667","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.22667v1","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.22667","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RFFJLXAMJKJH","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RFFJLXAM","created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22667","citing_title":"Imperfect Commitment in Maximal Extractable Value Auctions","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RFFJLXAM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RFFJLXAM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.22667&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RFFJLXAMJKJHJAF2LAQJPDEVAY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-22T02:04:49.280883+00:00"}