{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2005:RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6","short_pith_number":"pith:RJ22REQQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8a75a89210aea80d5e03577949cc2c2f9f708b643532a19318e4606d60a65abe","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-ph/0503207","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A new determination of the $\\gamma \\pi \\to \\pi\\pi$ anomalous amplitude via $\\pi^- e^- \\to \\pi^- e^- \\pi^{0}$ data","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Ocherashvili, I. Giller, M. A. Moinester, S. Scherer, T. Ebertshauser","submitted_at":"2005-03-21T17:16:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss the reaction $\\pi^- e^- \\to \\pi^- e^- \\pi^{0}$ with the purpose of obtaining information on the $\\gamma \\pi \\to \\pi\\pi$ anomalous amplitude ${\\cal F}_{3\\pi}$. We compare a full calculation at ${\\cal O}(p^6)$ in chiral perturbation theory and various phenomenological predictions with the existing data of Amendolia {\\em et al}. By integrating our theory results using Monte Carlo techniques we obtain $\\sigma= 2.05 $ nb at ${\\cal O}(p^6)$ and $\\sigma= 2.17 $ nb after including the dominant electromagnetic correction. Both results are in good agreement with the experimental cross section"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-ph/0503207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2005-03-21T17:16:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","nucl-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"2ee738b2dd9ceb4dba63d1b38bc305fa5b2114e8c1e807ea692d4048369c91d4","abstract_canon_sha256":"b9fa544ea15c9e70072f1489f97f30d8e4aed778238c836d379eb085188c0de8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056381Z","signature_b64":"dC0DgPgZ1/fPGdy7IUqFdelpUiLWSWruBBO6R43MK8v5E+ePzJOlO+Eoyb5jUHbvrXKkkh90Ug80M17a+WdLAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8a75a89210aea80d5e03577949cc2c2f9f708b643532a19318e4606d60a65abe","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.055972Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.055972Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A new determination of the $\\gamma \\pi \\to \\pi\\pi$ anomalous amplitude via $\\pi^- e^- \\to \\pi^- e^- \\pi^{0}$ data","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Ocherashvili, I. Giller, M. A. Moinester, S. Scherer, T. Ebertshauser","submitted_at":"2005-03-21T17:16:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss the reaction $\\pi^- e^- \\to \\pi^- e^- \\pi^{0}$ with the purpose of obtaining information on the $\\gamma \\pi \\to \\pi\\pi$ anomalous amplitude ${\\cal F}_{3\\pi}$. We compare a full calculation at ${\\cal O}(p^6)$ in chiral perturbation theory and various phenomenological predictions with the existing data of Amendolia {\\em et al}. By integrating our theory results using Monte Carlo techniques we obtain $\\sigma= 2.05 $ nb at ${\\cal O}(p^6)$ and $\\sigma= 2.17 $ nb after including the dominant electromagnetic correction. Both results are in good agreement with the experimental cross section"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-ph/0503207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-ph/0503207/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-ph/0503207","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-ph/0503207v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/0503207","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RJ22REQQV2UA","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RJ22REQQV2UA2XQD","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RJ22REQQ","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.13827","citing_title":"Extracting the chiral anomaly from $e^+e^-\\to 3\\pi$","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJ22REQQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJ22REQQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-ph/0503207&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RJ22REQQV2UA2XQDK54UTTBMF6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T16:55:38.056041+00:00"}