{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD","short_pith_number":"pith:RJOB5SJX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8a5c1ec937eb6f1433e81fe7c1a08388f287796ee71dd2f77f486a79237cb360","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2512.06556","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Semantic Attacks on Tool-Augmented LLMs: Securing the Model Context Protocol Against Descriptor-Level Manipulation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Foutse Khomh, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Saeid Jamshidi","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T20:07:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Model Context Protocol (MCP) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to interact with external tools via tool descriptors, thereby extending their capabilities for task execution, autonomous decision-making, and multi-agent coordination. Existing MCP deployments treat tool descriptors as trusted metadata, despite their direct integration into the LLM reasoning context. This introduces a previously underexplored semantic attack surface. Current defenses primarily target prompt injection, neglecting descriptor-level manipulation that can bias tool selection and downstream reasoning. To address "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2512.06556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T20:07:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"383b8a1302f03aabd6b9cdbe427c194e5c49db908dda2e34c4082264145ca891","abstract_canon_sha256":"c71a92e877b44f7dcfa9736d04ebecf64fc7f7beff2da7fa7ca100d58b832701"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811746Z","signature_b64":"DnPdFa0zK9XArH9ifSnpbyOoHMjNi4mQ08qcpW3AY+hws87/wDSBx7r77WdpIKmFSLJAkpJ1r5Kv2L9pYYT+BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8a5c1ec937eb6f1433e81fe7c1a08388f287796ee71dd2f77f486a79237cb360","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811004Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811004Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Semantic Attacks on Tool-Augmented LLMs: Securing the Model Context Protocol Against Descriptor-Level Manipulation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Foutse Khomh, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Saeid Jamshidi","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T20:07:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Model Context Protocol (MCP) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to interact with external tools via tool descriptors, thereby extending their capabilities for task execution, autonomous decision-making, and multi-agent coordination. Existing MCP deployments treat tool descriptors as trusted metadata, despite their direct integration into the LLM reasoning context. This introduces a previously underexplored semantic attack surface. Current defenses primarily target prompt injection, neglecting descriptor-level manipulation that can bias tool selection and downstream reasoning. To address "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2512.06556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2512.06556/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.06556","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.06556v2","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.06556","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RJOB5SJX5NXR","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7I","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RJOB5SJX","created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11327","citing_title":"Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05274","citing_title":"Sealing the Audit-Runtime Gap for LLM Skills","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05969","citing_title":"A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07551","citing_title":"MCP-DPT: A Defense-Placement Taxonomy and Coverage Analysis for Model Context Protocol Security","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17125","citing_title":"CASCADE: A Cascaded Hybrid Defense Architecture for Prompt Injection Detection in MCP-Based Systems","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJOB5SJX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJOB5SJX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2512.06556&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RJOB5SJX5NXRIM7ID7T4DIEDRD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-22T01:03:51.811109+00:00"}