{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V","short_pith_number":"pith:RJVQASIT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8a6b0049137f125332ee9f8ff76d8add4fe4041509c42404c2a052b60229c540","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.15817","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Heng Huang, Lichang Chen, R. Thomas McCoy, Simeng Han, Tong Zheng","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T17:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human beings naturally utilize multiple reasoning modalities to learn and solve logical problems, i.e., different representational formats such as natural language, code, and symbolic logic. In contrast, most existing LLM-based approaches operate with a single reasoning modality during training, typically natural language. Although some methods explored modality selection or augmentation at inference time, the training process remains modality-blind, limiting synergy among modalities. To fill in this gap, we propose Mixture-of-Thought (MoT), a framework that enables LLMs to reason across three"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.15817","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T17:59:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b3251e4864c8ec24836737e26160cbe6b256fa51a33a87afdd4089fe4a0bc82e","abstract_canon_sha256":"54b27b797dc0a9502371b6f4573036c4ca146a7238edb32c6abcf2ad3cdb2ec4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021641Z","signature_b64":"UMc53Y69SYn3CZZgDezRT3K0gltKocRuuuyAnAzEENfzsNXoPY4ra0vVBoti8lOBt/HdRCCxV0XvKp0LYVghAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8a6b0049137f125332ee9f8ff76d8add4fe4041509c42404c2a052b60229c540","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021147Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021147Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Heng Huang, Lichang Chen, R. Thomas McCoy, Simeng Han, Tong Zheng","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T17:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human beings naturally utilize multiple reasoning modalities to learn and solve logical problems, i.e., different representational formats such as natural language, code, and symbolic logic. In contrast, most existing LLM-based approaches operate with a single reasoning modality during training, typically natural language. Although some methods explored modality selection or augmentation at inference time, the training process remains modality-blind, limiting synergy among modalities. To fill in this gap, we propose Mixture-of-Thought (MoT), a framework that enables LLMs to reason across three"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.15817","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.15817/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.15817","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.15817v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.15817","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RJVQASITP4JF","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RJVQASITP4JFGMXO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RJVQASIT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03102","citing_title":"Small RL Controller, Large Language Model: RL-Guided Adaptive Sampling for Test-Time Scaling","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.02521","citing_title":"Large Lemma Miners: Can LLMs do Induction Proofs for Hardware?","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10341","citing_title":"VeriTrans: Fine-Tuned LLM-Assisted NL-to-PL Translation via a Deterministic Neuro-Symbolic Pipeline","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18493","citing_title":"Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJVQASIT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RJVQASIT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.15817&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RJVQASITP4JFGMXOT6H7O3MK3V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:43.021202+00:00"}