{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ","short_pith_number":"pith:RL6SDGRK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8afd219a2a368b66af6a5645e33116727e816512fd2bd890dcb88902118b87a3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.07878","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Mapping Technical Safety Research at AI Companies: A literature review and incentives analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Oliver Guest, Oscar Delaney, Zoe Williams","submitted_at":"2024-09-12T09:34:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"As AI systems become more advanced, concerns about large-scale risks from misuse or accidents have grown. This report analyzes the technical research into safe AI development being conducted by three leading AI companies: Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI.\n  We define safe AI development as developing AI systems that are unlikely to pose large-scale misuse or accident risks. This encompasses a range of technical approaches aimed at ensuring AI systems behave as intended and do not cause unintended harm, even as they are made more capable and autonomous.\n  We analyzed all papers published "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.07878","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-09-12T09:34:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8a1774061677dde657d576a0c8ad0e3a10823c5cdc04a5911c95e1edcc8164c4","abstract_canon_sha256":"bd8b00c873148d6aa183497b70f70cf390620f7525f2d4b65ee543ffe76d9970"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741658Z","signature_b64":"DeMrIj7VO71CKMiJMPoWb53q8yOCT0K9FIfGoKLBbRitZCDn4ofyRYp+JCxA82sGDAu4bEyqHgqsnxAt35kWCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8afd219a2a368b66af6a5645e33116727e816512fd2bd890dcb88902118b87a3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741211Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741211Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Mapping Technical Safety Research at AI Companies: A literature review and incentives analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Oliver Guest, Oscar Delaney, Zoe Williams","submitted_at":"2024-09-12T09:34:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"As AI systems become more advanced, concerns about large-scale risks from misuse or accidents have grown. This report analyzes the technical research into safe AI development being conducted by three leading AI companies: Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI.\n  We define safe AI development as developing AI systems that are unlikely to pose large-scale misuse or accident risks. This encompasses a range of technical approaches aimed at ensuring AI systems behave as intended and do not cause unintended harm, even as they are made more capable and autonomous.\n  We analyzed all papers published "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.07878","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.07878/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.07878","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.07878v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.07878","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RL6SDGRKG2FW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3K","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RL6SDGRK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.00174","citing_title":"Real-World Gaps in AI Governance Research","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RL6SDGRK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RL6SDGRK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.07878&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RL6SDGRKG2FWNL3KKZC6GMIWOJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:11:29.741270+00:00"}