{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC","short_pith_number":"pith:RLQCJXDT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8ae024dc7316e86e005afded587882c8b877ea0102ba8ee2be406cf712526f18","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.03600","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Heterogeneous participation and allocation skews: when is choice \"worth it\"?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Nikhil Garg","submitted_at":"2025-07-04T14:15:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"A core ethos of the Economics and Computation (EconCS) community is that people have complex private preferences and information of which the central planner is unaware, but which an appropriately designed mechanism can uncover to improve collective decisionmaking. This ethos underlies the community's largest deployed success stories, from stable matching systems to participatory budgeting. I ask: is this choice and information aggregation ``worth it''? In particular, I discuss how such systems induce \\textit{heterogeneous participation}: those already relatively advantaged are, empirically, m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.03600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-07-04T14:15:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"6eb868f12d7a7ec3fb0190a4c2ae6f667f973105d9a3584be7217c88dfee41c5","abstract_canon_sha256":"fb38f8ca9c17fb75894bee10ecdec954e4030479f6a188ac3fdfbf573f2c532e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.399427Z","signature_b64":"IALCVcPmvrcrY/kN052lRcfX3z6IW+HfkqJ3E1QqVgM2i7qZjBgMvhizPwSHJ9LYAV72FT+RCD8bY/Nv8Yu8Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8ae024dc7316e86e005afded587882c8b877ea0102ba8ee2be406cf712526f18","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398926Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398926Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Heterogeneous participation and allocation skews: when is choice \"worth it\"?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Nikhil Garg","submitted_at":"2025-07-04T14:15:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"A core ethos of the Economics and Computation (EconCS) community is that people have complex private preferences and information of which the central planner is unaware, but which an appropriately designed mechanism can uncover to improve collective decisionmaking. This ethos underlies the community's largest deployed success stories, from stable matching systems to participatory budgeting. I ask: is this choice and information aggregation ``worth it''? In particular, I discuss how such systems induce \\textit{heterogeneous participation}: those already relatively advantaged are, empirically, m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.03600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.03600/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.03600","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.03600v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.03600","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RLQCJXDTC3UG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RLQCJXDT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15165","citing_title":"Due Process on Hold: A Queueing Framework for Improving Access in SNAP","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02773","citing_title":"A Critical Pragmatism Approach for Algorithmic Fairness: Lessons from Urban Planning Theory","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RLQCJXDT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RLQCJXDT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.03600&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RLQCJXDTC3UG4AC27XWVQ6ECZC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:32:02.398983+00:00"}