{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU","short_pith_number":"pith:RMS2YXR2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8b25ac5e3a198e2c25a1a566034f42450340e98362c799e9b1de76914bb81fd5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1611.07859","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why does steady-state magnetic reconnection have a maximum local rate of order 0.1?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.EP","astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.SR","physics.space-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.plasm-ph","authors_text":"F. Guo, H. Li, M. A. Shay, M. Hesse, P. A. Cassak, W. Daughton, Yi-Hsin Liu","submitted_at":"2016-11-23T16:16:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Simulations suggest collisionless steady-state magnetic reconnection of Harris-type current sheets proceeds with a rate of order 0.1, independent of dissipation mechanism. We argue this long-standing puzzle is a result of constraints at the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) scale. We perform a scaling analysis of the reconnection rate as a function of the opening angle made by the upstream magnetic fields, finding a maximum reconnection rate close to 0.2. The predictions compare favorably to particle-in-cell simulations of relativistic electron-positron and non-relativistic electron-proton reconnectio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1611.07859","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.plasm-ph","submitted_at":"2016-11-23T16:16:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.EP","astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.SR","physics.space-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"ab795c0a91faa7559de56c6c9119db1d6f02268307eb3e3a4fb85a1362cd4e11","abstract_canon_sha256":"2ace248e38274d46640c1ab34271449dbeb26ec05d0096ea8aec1acbb57afb7a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132600Z","signature_b64":"7OpXG0/rELq4xf2YR8gA9wKS1TIqGKsY1zf/8c4vVmK9RxcyM6FACzQS5bxZltSLip/0c9qQkgDbN7P3HoqfBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8b25ac5e3a198e2c25a1a566034f42450340e98362c799e9b1de76914bb81fd5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132101Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132101Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why does steady-state magnetic reconnection have a maximum local rate of order 0.1?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.EP","astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.SR","physics.space-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.plasm-ph","authors_text":"F. Guo, H. Li, M. A. Shay, M. Hesse, P. A. Cassak, W. Daughton, Yi-Hsin Liu","submitted_at":"2016-11-23T16:16:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Simulations suggest collisionless steady-state magnetic reconnection of Harris-type current sheets proceeds with a rate of order 0.1, independent of dissipation mechanism. We argue this long-standing puzzle is a result of constraints at the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) scale. We perform a scaling analysis of the reconnection rate as a function of the opening angle made by the upstream magnetic fields, finding a maximum reconnection rate close to 0.2. The predictions compare favorably to particle-in-cell simulations of relativistic electron-positron and non-relativistic electron-proton reconnectio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1611.07859","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1611.07859","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1611.07859v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1611.07859","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132182+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RMS2YXR2DGHC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RMS2YXR2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:41.710351+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17195","citing_title":"On the Nature of Candle-Flame-Shaped Solar Flares and Sub-Alfv\\'enic Supra-Arcade Plasma Downflows","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.23292","citing_title":"Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Bumblebee gravity","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RMS2YXR2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RMS2YXR2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1611.07859&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RMS2YXR2DGHCYJNBUVTAGT2CIU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132182+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:51.132182+00:00"}