{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB","short_pith_number":"pith:RN6PVFP7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8b7cfa95ff352d0ee51edbacf77101687153959846301a79368a429403fe063f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.21028","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Measuring and identifying factors of individuals' trust in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Edoardo Sebastiano De Duro, Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri, Hudson Golino, Massimo Stella","submitted_at":"2025-02-28T13:16:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) can engage in human-looking conversational exchanges. Although conversations can elicit trust between users and LLMs, scarce empirical research has examined trust formation in human-LLM contexts, beyond LLMs' trustworthiness or human trust in AI in general. Here, we introduce the Trust-In-LLMs Index (TILLMI) as a new framework to measure individuals' trust in LLMs, extending McAllister's cognitive and affective trust dimensions to LLM-human interactions. We developed TILLMI as a psychometric scale, prototyped with a novel protocol we called LLM-simulated validity. "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.21028","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-02-28T13:16:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"753854a925411c08311bf6700eef64bd9d45f824dd819b9846fdac4ae6f263aa","abstract_canon_sha256":"97f8a1cd0ffac466688e7b665b35e576129967cd5e3f0397be6ca2893f62dba0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.106342Z","signature_b64":"ASObR+cGcSe257QuXugjR5MP02UIrsR+zNvYTNEuFhiFm3HzW6B7YpJeIFTXQV3xCPOXQJFPu99Z7s592Yo8Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8b7cfa95ff352d0ee51edbacf77101687153959846301a79368a429403fe063f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105264Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105264Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Measuring and identifying factors of individuals' trust in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Edoardo Sebastiano De Duro, Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri, Hudson Golino, Massimo Stella","submitted_at":"2025-02-28T13:16:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) can engage in human-looking conversational exchanges. Although conversations can elicit trust between users and LLMs, scarce empirical research has examined trust formation in human-LLM contexts, beyond LLMs' trustworthiness or human trust in AI in general. Here, we introduce the Trust-In-LLMs Index (TILLMI) as a new framework to measure individuals' trust in LLMs, extending McAllister's cognitive and affective trust dimensions to LLM-human interactions. We developed TILLMI as a psychometric scale, prototyped with a novel protocol we called LLM-simulated validity. "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.21028","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.21028/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.21028","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.21028v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.21028","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RN6PVFP7GUWQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RN6PVFP7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27617","citing_title":"Robust Lightweight Crack Classification for Real-Time UAV Bridge Inspection","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27618","citing_title":"Math Education Digital Shadows for Investigating Learning with GenAI: Mathematics Performance, Anxiety, and Confidence in LLMs","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27624","citing_title":"Mapping how LLMs debate societal issues when shadowing human personality traits, sociodemographics and social media behavior","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04354","citing_title":"Talk2AI: A Longitudinal Dataset of Human--AI Persuasive Conversations","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16935","citing_title":"LLMs can persuade only psychologically susceptible humans on societal issues, via trust in AI and emotional appeals, amid logical fallacies","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RN6PVFP7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RN6PVFP7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.21028&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RN6PVFP7GUWQ5ZI63OWPO4IBNB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:24:56.105437+00:00"}