{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6","short_pith_number":"pith:RNUWLOCM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8b6965b84c38c9da57268ace06cad1a799730ec8114cf9e547474f705f94ca6d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1406.6618","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When is it Better to Compare than to Score?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Abhay Parekh, Joseph Bradley, Kannan Ramchandran, Martin Wainwright, Nihar B. Shah, Sivaraman Balakrishnan","submitted_at":"2014-06-25T15:48:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"When eliciting judgements from humans for an unknown quantity, one often has the choice of making direct-scoring (cardinal) or comparative (ordinal) measurements. In this paper we study the relative merits of either choice, providing empirical and theoretical guidelines for the selection of a measurement scheme. We provide empirical evidence based on experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk that in a variety of tasks, (pairwise-comparative) ordinal measurements have lower per sample noise and are typically faster to elicit than cardinal ones. Ordinal measurements however typically provide less in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1406.6618","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2014-06-25T15:48:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"c4cd980f41b7d1c7ea59b8983a2e403c7527c05750f8102eb46e2a7e1f04a2b7","abstract_canon_sha256":"ec13874691818ccc8d807c4672ea8b701f30920a23e39f16e8e3c9d1161d7346"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.305119Z","signature_b64":"DoljzyAXeAUPLUltTj+8lzLJM+A2fMTgXVaUPUJA/Cis3sfwhUoZwiu9YIiu47S6SxL5j1ZmWUr/bE10yNv7Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8b6965b84c38c9da57268ace06cad1a799730ec8114cf9e547474f705f94ca6d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304717Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304717Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When is it Better to Compare than to Score?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Abhay Parekh, Joseph Bradley, Kannan Ramchandran, Martin Wainwright, Nihar B. Shah, Sivaraman Balakrishnan","submitted_at":"2014-06-25T15:48:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"When eliciting judgements from humans for an unknown quantity, one often has the choice of making direct-scoring (cardinal) or comparative (ordinal) measurements. In this paper we study the relative merits of either choice, providing empirical and theoretical guidelines for the selection of a measurement scheme. We provide empirical evidence based on experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk that in a variety of tasks, (pairwise-comparative) ordinal measurements have lower per sample noise and are typically faster to elicit than cardinal ones. Ordinal measurements however typically provide less in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1406.6618","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1406.6618","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304775+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1406.6618v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304775+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1406.6618","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304775+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RNUWLOCMHDE5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:46.137349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:46.137349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RNUWLOCM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:46.137349+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.14674","citing_title":"From User Preferences to Base Score Extraction Functions in Gradual Argumentation (with Appendix)","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12079","citing_title":"Elicitation-Augmented Bayesian Optimization","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RNUWLOCM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RNUWLOCM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1406.6618&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RNUWLOCMHDE5UVZGRLHANSWRU6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304775+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:02.304775+00:00"}