{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6","short_pith_number":"pith:RNVB7Z72","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8b6a1fe7fa59542c5a31b8d82569d26fb03118b9b0ef32497bda35dca1a40e2c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.10645","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Separators Improve Chain-of-Thought Prompting?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chanyeol Choi, HyunJin Kim, Junseong Kim, Jy-yong Sohn, Yoonjeong Park","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T12:46:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is a simple and effective method for improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). The basic idea of CoT is to let LLMs break down their thought processes step-by-step by putting exemplars in the input prompt. However, the densely structured prompt exemplars of CoT may cause the cognitive overload of LLMs. Inspired by human cognition, we introduce COT-SEP, a method that strategically employs separators at the end of each exemplar in CoT prompting. These separators are designed to help the LLMs understand their thought processes better wh"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.10645","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T12:46:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"53346722cd2dbdd210f0587886aec9a5ed22b1aee4b678aef720333723f6a13e","abstract_canon_sha256":"ba54cf90f1babd0351fa7df4c9b36b0ae9f06f5be4b9d91e0b26556095ece83f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480742Z","signature_b64":"BKHddCpjrQ7TpYjdjASvJEKb4qH5T0B3tKa2v9VHe3yLoMww+uivP7VpCfc+0dXK7VOHAWAxT5FTRidZ2elXCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8b6a1fe7fa59542c5a31b8d82569d26fb03118b9b0ef32497bda35dca1a40e2c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480296Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480296Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Separators Improve Chain-of-Thought Prompting?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chanyeol Choi, HyunJin Kim, Junseong Kim, Jy-yong Sohn, Yoonjeong Park","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T12:46:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is a simple and effective method for improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). The basic idea of CoT is to let LLMs break down their thought processes step-by-step by putting exemplars in the input prompt. However, the densely structured prompt exemplars of CoT may cause the cognitive overload of LLMs. Inspired by human cognition, we introduce COT-SEP, a method that strategically employs separators at the end of each exemplar in CoT prompting. These separators are designed to help the LLMs understand their thought processes better wh"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.10645","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.10645/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.10645","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.10645v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.10645","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RNVB7Z72LFKC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RNVB7Z72","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.02026","citing_title":"Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models","ref_index":97,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RNVB7Z72"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RNVB7Z72","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.10645&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RNVB7Z72LFKCYWRRXDMCK2OSN6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:43.480376+00:00"}