{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2","short_pith_number":"pith:ROH53HDP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8b8fdd9c6fd14a8dc3f24d058f6957c6943b484a2c7eb90d0d38e23c73c75e36","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.15600","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conflicting narratives and polarization on social media","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Armin Pournaki","submitted_at":"2025-07-21T13:22:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Narratives are key interpretative devices by which humans make sense of political reality. In this work, we show how the analysis of conflicting narratives, i.e. conflicting interpretive lenses through which political reality is experienced and told, provides insight into the discursive mechanisms of polarization and issue alignment in the public sphere. Building upon previous work that has identified ideologically polarized issues in the German Twittersphere between 2021 and 2023, we analyze the discursive dimension of polarization by extracting textual signals of conflicting narratives from "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.15600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-07-21T13:22:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0f85aeb4557e5cc6c298a4680c53f57f828fb646b503f90f90011e5530158592","abstract_canon_sha256":"0b6f6a2a4b9a5a3ee6c90989d615dc4f15f18cc45fb71af06e85638fe543e7a2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.835214Z","signature_b64":"2rR3nI73vaGSXNotiS9mwQbkDvLkSjFQi7VgaG5XPRTgNon/VNYAKL0nPlq0BvEr2ciY79lfN9j122l+CkabBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8b8fdd9c6fd14a8dc3f24d058f6957c6943b484a2c7eb90d0d38e23c73c75e36","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834776Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834776Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conflicting narratives and polarization on social media","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Armin Pournaki","submitted_at":"2025-07-21T13:22:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Narratives are key interpretative devices by which humans make sense of political reality. In this work, we show how the analysis of conflicting narratives, i.e. conflicting interpretive lenses through which political reality is experienced and told, provides insight into the discursive mechanisms of polarization and issue alignment in the public sphere. Building upon previous work that has identified ideologically polarized issues in the German Twittersphere between 2021 and 2023, we analyze the discursive dimension of polarization by extracting textual signals of conflicting narratives from "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.15600","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.15600/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.15600","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.15600v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.15600","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ROH53HDP2FFI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7S","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ROH53HDP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09197","citing_title":"An Experimental Method to Study Opinion Diffusion in Human-AI Hybrid Societies","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ROH53HDP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ROH53HDP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.15600&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ROH53HDP2FFI3Q7SJUCY62KXY2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:39.834829+00:00"}