{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO","short_pith_number":"pith:RP5NZKQM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8bfadcaa0c5cac754468534dff4f8f239f78c2ad6d8469661274c2ec988875b5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.09618","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Agam Goyal, Dhavan Shah, Junjie Hu, Nikunj Harlalka, Robert Hawkins, Siddharth Suresh, Sijia Yang, Timothy T. Rogers, Yun-Shiuan Chuang","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T07:01:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurately simulating human opinion dynamics is crucial for understanding a variety of societal phenomena, including polarization and the spread of misinformation. However, the agent-based models (ABMs) commonly used for such simulations often over-simplify human behavior. We propose a new approach to simulating opinion dynamics based on populations of Large Language Models (LLMs). Our findings reveal a strong inherent bias in LLM agents towards producing accurate information, leading simulated agents to consensus in line with scientific reality. This bias limits their utility for understandin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.09618","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T07:01:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"fc2ad4b69c7c8e027ac86d894d9446b42bce1d1d2d3a115fe31311032ed0e001","abstract_canon_sha256":"4ec0ddb2a7d57b6731a0e84dbe83930647933d55f0c48f38729eb5cc54b91aa4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.125396Z","signature_b64":"W+KR/tbn/a7F7Th7q5BMysFh7eNUJn1XK/Jk/PiqaA7awNRx3FlalwhWxM1chW4ZkMAW2m49IIiN8vyZetqDDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8bfadcaa0c5cac754468534dff4f8f239f78c2ad6d8469661274c2ec988875b5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124927Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124927Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Agam Goyal, Dhavan Shah, Junjie Hu, Nikunj Harlalka, Robert Hawkins, Siddharth Suresh, Sijia Yang, Timothy T. Rogers, Yun-Shiuan Chuang","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T07:01:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurately simulating human opinion dynamics is crucial for understanding a variety of societal phenomena, including polarization and the spread of misinformation. However, the agent-based models (ABMs) commonly used for such simulations often over-simplify human behavior. We propose a new approach to simulating opinion dynamics based on populations of Large Language Models (LLMs). Our findings reveal a strong inherent bias in LLM agents towards producing accurate information, leading simulated agents to consensus in line with scientific reality. This bias limits their utility for understandin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.09618","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.09618/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.09618","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.09618v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.09618","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RP5NZKQMLSWH","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RP5NZKQM","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":10,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07387","citing_title":"A Large Language Model-Driven Agent-Based Modeling Framework with Multi-Round Communication for Simulating Vaccine Opinion Dynamics","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22203","citing_title":"When Is Emergent Consensus Real? A Measured Coupling Gain and a Validity Diagnostic for LLM Agent Societies","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19494","citing_title":"Hidden Anchors in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06858","citing_title":"Disentangling Interaction and Bias Effects in Opinion Dynamics of Large Language Models","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.03140","citing_title":"How to Model AI Agents as Personas?: Applying the Persona Ecosystem Playground to 41,300 Posts on Moltbook for Behavioral Insights","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.18985","citing_title":"Simulating Online Social Media Conversations on Controversial Topics Using AI Agents Calibrated on Real-World Data","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12512","citing_title":"Beyond Individual Mimicry: Constructing Human-Like Social network with Graph-Augmented LLM Agents","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.13334","citing_title":"A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models","ref_index":184,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10528","citing_title":"Collective Alignment in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Disentangling Bias from Cooperation via Statistical Physics","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11312","citing_title":"Network Effects and Agreement Drift in LLM Debates","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RP5NZKQM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RP5NZKQM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.09618&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RP5NZKQMLSWHKRDIKNG76T4PEO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:48.124982+00:00"}