{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU","short_pith_number":"pith:RQMDYVMR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8c183c55911abba4c0ddb6524a582aa534964661591935929e86f5b967a893e7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1903.10952","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Emergence of the $\\Delta U=0$ Rule in Charm Physics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Stefan Schacht, Yuval Grossman","submitted_at":"2019-03-26T15:17:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss the implications of the recent discovery of CP violation in two-body SCS $D$ decays by LHCb. We show that the result can be explained within the SM without the need for any large $SU(3)$ breaking effects. It further enables the determination of the imaginary part of the ratio of the $\\Delta U=0$ over $\\Delta U=1$ matrix elements in charm decays, which we find to be $(0.65\\pm 0.12)$. Within the standard model, the result proves the non-perturbative nature of the penguin contraction of tree operators in charm decays, similar to the known non-perturbative enhancement of $\\Delta I=1/2$ "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1903.10952","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2019-03-26T15:17:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"955d9c86fed578fba06b833c747683fd8d6a3652edf647e697c6414c73c282e5","abstract_canon_sha256":"142f3a91fd4db15a0ad325b5597e60e6d2099ccea73451ec679e768211ff88cb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754744Z","signature_b64":"6xxNH3Sr3RdI69DLEA9aMClJzTqH+HxaHhwzbX++AFb6ukTwJEBoOHoJ6TMjMeg6NodLOWwWjHHS37b3eaGGAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8c183c55911abba4c0ddb6524a582aa534964661591935929e86f5b967a893e7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754285Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754285Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Emergence of the $\\Delta U=0$ Rule in Charm Physics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Stefan Schacht, Yuval Grossman","submitted_at":"2019-03-26T15:17:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss the implications of the recent discovery of CP violation in two-body SCS $D$ decays by LHCb. We show that the result can be explained within the SM without the need for any large $SU(3)$ breaking effects. It further enables the determination of the imaginary part of the ratio of the $\\Delta U=0$ over $\\Delta U=1$ matrix elements in charm decays, which we find to be $(0.65\\pm 0.12)$. Within the standard model, the result proves the non-perturbative nature of the penguin contraction of tree operators in charm decays, similar to the known non-perturbative enhancement of $\\Delta I=1/2$ "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1903.10952","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1903.10952/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1903.10952","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1903.10952v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1903.10952","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RQMDYVMRDK52","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RQMDYVMR","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.01292","citing_title":"Measurements of time-dependent $C\\!P$ violation and mixing in charm at LHCb","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04137","citing_title":"CP asymmetries in charged meson decay to two pions","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RQMDYVMR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RQMDYVMR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1903.10952&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RQMDYVMRDK52JQG5WZJEUWBKUU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:30:03.754362+00:00"}