{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI","short_pith_number":"pith:RQQAPKZP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8c2007ab2fc619be465f3e484963ed2a0b62cf6ef9695b0fd78fa3f9b25d4238","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.26191","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Position: Evaluation Scores Are Perishable Knowledge Claims","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Sankalp Gilda, Shlok Gilda","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T18:50:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evaluation methodologies for language models increasingly combine multiple signals, from automated metrics and LLM-as-judge ratings to human assessments and benchmark suite results. When these signals are aggregated via averaging, evaluation confidence can then substantially exceed the reliability of the weakest signal: a phenomenon we call trust inflation in evaluation. We argue that evaluation scores should be treated as epistemic claims with three properties: formality (human evaluation provides stronger evidence than an automated metric), scope (a benchmark result applies to the tested dis"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.26191","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T18:50:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SE"],"title_canon_sha256":"58cf312fe280a6ebf17c09dd52a27f70410f08a87721342de2a4d117e096157a","abstract_canon_sha256":"8a509c13fe842767406039897eeade9faa05907049bc0d0d40712f28d7e21ddb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8c2007ab2fc619be465f3e484963ed2a0b62cf6ef9695b0fd78fa3f9b25d4238","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.871945Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.871945Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Position: Evaluation Scores Are Perishable Knowledge Claims","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Sankalp Gilda, Shlok Gilda","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T18:50:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evaluation methodologies for language models increasingly combine multiple signals, from automated metrics and LLM-as-judge ratings to human assessments and benchmark suite results. When these signals are aggregated via averaging, evaluation confidence can then substantially exceed the reliability of the weakest signal: a phenomenon we call trust inflation in evaluation. We argue that evaluation scores should be treated as epistemic claims with three properties: formality (human evaluation provides stronger evidence than an automated metric), scope (a benchmark result applies to the tested dis"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.26191","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.26191/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.26191","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.26191v1","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.26191","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RQQAPKZPYYM3","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RQQAPKZP","created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RQQAPKZP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RQQAPKZP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.26191&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RQQAPKZPYYM34RS7HZEESY7NFI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-30T00:08:40.875637+00:00"}