{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B","short_pith_number":"pith:RRRQOCZP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8c63070b2f318cd2ef4b49bf812a8fd86a3ecbd2486914e36a39597c3ce0692b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2303.00621","version":9},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The (Computational) Social Choice Take on Indivisible Participatory Budgeting","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Felicia Schmidt, Jan Maly, Simon Rey","submitted_at":"2023-03-01T16:22:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this survey, we review the literature investigating participatory budgeting as a social choice problem. Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic process in which citizens are asked to vote on how to allocate a given amount of public money to a set of projects. From a social choice perspective, it corresponds then to the problem of aggregating opinions about which projects should be funded, into a budget allocation satisfying a budget constraint. This problem has received substantial attention in recent years and the literature is growing at a fast pace. In this survey, we present the mo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2303.00621","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2023-03-01T16:22:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"e7a51ca6baad48022b7b906ca875163523037ec633dd7e9db51d310c6d666540","abstract_canon_sha256":"924c749d114d73b57689cea44f91a4f5eb80d5bdc06cec8400cabe45a9cc1e30"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.443020Z","signature_b64":"L48t1nK+RbSnNVHsd+GO2DLeOmv8iFiFp1nvks+oO0RXBKypiK86qHQ3aUfHhVvVmz1ELzkr9ofmXx2P5IJ+BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8c63070b2f318cd2ef4b49bf812a8fd86a3ecbd2486914e36a39597c3ce0692b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442544Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442544Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The (Computational) Social Choice Take on Indivisible Participatory Budgeting","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Felicia Schmidt, Jan Maly, Simon Rey","submitted_at":"2023-03-01T16:22:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this survey, we review the literature investigating participatory budgeting as a social choice problem. Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic process in which citizens are asked to vote on how to allocate a given amount of public money to a set of projects. From a social choice perspective, it corresponds then to the problem of aggregating opinions about which projects should be funded, into a budget allocation satisfying a budget constraint. This problem has received substantial attention in recent years and the literature is growing at a fast pace. In this survey, we present the mo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2303.00621","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2303.00621/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2303.00621","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2303.00621v9","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.00621","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RRRQOCZPGGGN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RRRQOCZPGGGNF32L","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RRRQOCZP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19264","citing_title":"Swimming with Whales: Analysis of Power Imbalances in Stake-Weighted Governance","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11736","citing_title":"Approximate Strategyproofness in Approval-based Budget Division","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RRRQOCZP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RRRQOCZP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2303.00621&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RRRQOCZPGGGNF32LJG7YCKUP3B/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:17.442605+00:00"}