{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY","short_pith_number":"pith:RWBTANCD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8d833034433697031f6c055cdd898b063cdbd245b06649aad4f07dd49d1345f2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.22932","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Conversational Task-Solving","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jonas Becker","submitted_at":"2024-10-30T11:38:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In an era where single large language models have dominated the landscape of artificial intelligence for years, multi-agent systems arise as new protagonists in conversational task-solving. While previous studies have showcased their potential in reasoning tasks and creative endeavors, an analysis of their limitations concerning the conversational paradigms and the impact of individual agents is missing. It remains unascertained how multi-agent discussions perform across tasks of varying complexity and how the structure of these conversations influences the process. To fill that gap, this work"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.22932","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-30T11:38:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"010a5c8174a99aefead1b0403952a2ed43ba43b8637c590ad651469e2f4688bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"898dbf9b7e64b640202a86518d61115cbff6c34c874a6e46235ab1becf1c29a6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.236370Z","signature_b64":"am+qFJFWx3qFKWgWyd/Q7epljhTLw3cWjGLq5qq3S1mFa0AVhEVvdCTrYK5mFDnbvD3hZDnkXaQFGwtg5PkiCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8d833034433697031f6c055cdd898b063cdbd245b06649aad4f07dd49d1345f2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235893Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235893Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Conversational Task-Solving","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jonas Becker","submitted_at":"2024-10-30T11:38:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In an era where single large language models have dominated the landscape of artificial intelligence for years, multi-agent systems arise as new protagonists in conversational task-solving. While previous studies have showcased their potential in reasoning tasks and creative endeavors, an analysis of their limitations concerning the conversational paradigms and the impact of individual agents is missing. It remains unascertained how multi-agent discussions perform across tasks of varying complexity and how the structure of these conversations influences the process. To fill that gap, this work"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.22932","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.22932/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.22932","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.22932v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.22932","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RWBTANCDG2LQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RWBTANCDG2LQGH3M","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RWBTANCD","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19494","citing_title":"Hidden Anchors in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.19559","citing_title":"Stay Focused: Problem Drift in Multi-Agent Debate","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.05743","citing_title":"Designing Explainable Conversational Agentic Systems for Guaran\\'i Speakers","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.27253","citing_title":"Mitigating Hallucination on Hallucination in RAG via Ensemble Voting","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWBTANCD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWBTANCD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.22932&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RWBTANCDG2LQGH3MAVON3CMLAY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:35.235955+00:00"}