{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM","short_pith_number":"pith:RWMTHNY7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8d9933b71f720023ff86cd7ce97bf4230cf28549169ddbfc8fcf8f1e971f3be8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.08194","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On black-box separations of quantum digital signatures from pseudorandom states","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Coladangelo, Saachi Mutreja","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T03:36:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well-known that digital signatures can be constructed from one-way functions in a black-box way. While one-way functions are essentially the minimal assumption in classical cryptography, this is not the case in the quantum setting. A variety of qualitatively weaker and inherently quantum assumptions (e.g. EFI pairs, one-way state generators, and pseudorandom states) are known to be sufficient for non-trivial quantum cryptography.\n  While it is known that commitments, zero-knowledge proofs, and even multiparty computation can be constructed from these assumptions, it has remained an open "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.08194","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T03:36:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"00eaab2b43af119a9c3352f38ceab162fed5eb0580011bf20c28e3eeb88a3e83","abstract_canon_sha256":"a6b134982892c110856c0ba0b584712334c526d2b4ba0ef55a70342f5217eefe"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.562283Z","signature_b64":"Ifiyi531FOrI/poMM/hnHQSumbEGqiNB6nbseQ8VE5wuEBGK2tLWgDQJtum07o2PwdubUMIc/wRtL2EodMUvDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8d9933b71f720023ff86cd7ce97bf4230cf28549169ddbfc8fcf8f1e971f3be8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561886Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561886Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On black-box separations of quantum digital signatures from pseudorandom states","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Coladangelo, Saachi Mutreja","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T03:36:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well-known that digital signatures can be constructed from one-way functions in a black-box way. While one-way functions are essentially the minimal assumption in classical cryptography, this is not the case in the quantum setting. A variety of qualitatively weaker and inherently quantum assumptions (e.g. EFI pairs, one-way state generators, and pseudorandom states) are known to be sufficient for non-trivial quantum cryptography.\n  While it is known that commitments, zero-knowledge proofs, and even multiparty computation can be constructed from these assumptions, it has remained an open "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.08194","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.08194/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.08194","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.08194v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.08194","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RWMTHNY7OIAC","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RWMTHNY7OIACH74G","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RWMTHNY7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.14461","citing_title":"MicroCrypt Assumptions with Quantum Input Sampling and Pseudodeterminism: Constructions and Separations","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWMTHNY7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWMTHNY7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.08194&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RWMTHNY7OIACH74GZV6OS67UEM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:28.561944+00:00"}