{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA","short_pith_number":"pith:RWPXP4AE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8d9f77f004a753721b3c45ba6e2e9fa80726bf2acdf16e2a50605d1563aac8be","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2105.13562","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arnab Bhattacharya, Ashutosh Modi, Kripa Ghosh, Rishabh Sanjay, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Vijit Malik","submitted_at":"2021-05-28T03:07:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"An automated system that could assist a judge in predicting the outcome of a case would help expedite the judicial process. For such a system to be practically useful, predictions by the system should be explainable. To promote research in developing such a system, we introduce ILDC (Indian Legal Documents Corpus). ILDC is a large corpus of 35k Indian Supreme Court cases annotated with original court decisions. A portion of the corpus (a separate test set) is annotated with gold standard explanations by legal experts. Based on ILDC, we propose the task of Court Judgment Prediction and Explanat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2105.13562","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-05-28T03:07:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"22cda6fa8869062e6b4100cc0b34af6901b3309e574f5de930ef24005d362bab","abstract_canon_sha256":"a686b26563edc76020dac2bbe9e1a55e45da7485b5732bd3bc6944f347341a18"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.201010Z","signature_b64":"lBkHvaI8psSXiLvI9Rts5ccOHgfSnkHVxqQZzhWIzFZHwZOgRlab/aFhVd6mR3+2lIC65lTkKXmHHq3yIHaPCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8d9f77f004a753721b3c45ba6e2e9fa80726bf2acdf16e2a50605d1563aac8be","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200472Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200472Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arnab Bhattacharya, Ashutosh Modi, Kripa Ghosh, Rishabh Sanjay, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Vijit Malik","submitted_at":"2021-05-28T03:07:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"An automated system that could assist a judge in predicting the outcome of a case would help expedite the judicial process. For such a system to be practically useful, predictions by the system should be explainable. To promote research in developing such a system, we introduce ILDC (Indian Legal Documents Corpus). ILDC is a large corpus of 35k Indian Supreme Court cases annotated with original court decisions. A portion of the corpus (a separate test set) is annotated with gold standard explanations by legal experts. Based on ILDC, we propose the task of Court Judgment Prediction and Explanat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2105.13562","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2105.13562/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2105.13562","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2105.13562v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2105.13562","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RWPXP4AEU5JX","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RWPXP4AE","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.02241","citing_title":"LLMs for LLMs: A Structured Prompting Methodology for Long Legal Documents","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWPXP4AE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RWPXP4AE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2105.13562&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RWPXP4AEU5JXEGZ4IW5G4LU7VA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:44:38.200529+00:00"}