{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT","short_pith_number":"pith:RZPD7XTN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"8e5e3fde6dee1d279f95e149a062ca7ce048ba45b59391e76d6863559e1bc029","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1911.07852","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Entanglement Wedge Cross Sections Require Tripartite Entanglement","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Chris Akers, Pratik Rath","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T19:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We argue that holographic CFT states require a large amount of tripartite entanglement, in contrast to the conjecture that their entanglement is mostly bipartite. Our evidence is that this mostly-bipartite conjecture is in sharp conflict with two well-supported conjectures about the entanglement wedge cross section surface $E_W$. If $E_W$ is related to either the CFT's reflected entropy or its entanglement of purification, then those quantities can differ from the mutual information at $\\mathcal{O}(\\frac{1}{G_N})$. We prove that this implies holographic CFT states must have $\\mathcal{O}(\\frac{"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1911.07852","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T19:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["quant-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"44302876ac2714c58a534bc35613f857a9f028c91fa4bfdaf0ab3d59a542e657","abstract_canon_sha256":"e758208072a61b093c62842c7196a1c413019e6a75a7652018d580c0388a59b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.286112Z","signature_b64":"8ecFj/y3Sr7gikBDwUkLunLQkE3HZdd83fH4EUBpLJqJmPWQiirHpVGbgP6Od0oC2SJ6Z4RoX42mjlLFOPSGDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"8e5e3fde6dee1d279f95e149a062ca7ce048ba45b59391e76d6863559e1bc029","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285613Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285613Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Entanglement Wedge Cross Sections Require Tripartite Entanglement","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Chris Akers, Pratik Rath","submitted_at":"2019-11-18T19:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We argue that holographic CFT states require a large amount of tripartite entanglement, in contrast to the conjecture that their entanglement is mostly bipartite. Our evidence is that this mostly-bipartite conjecture is in sharp conflict with two well-supported conjectures about the entanglement wedge cross section surface $E_W$. If $E_W$ is related to either the CFT's reflected entropy or its entanglement of purification, then those quantities can differ from the mutual information at $\\mathcal{O}(\\frac{1}{G_N})$. We prove that this implies holographic CFT states must have $\\mathcal{O}(\\frac{"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1911.07852","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1911.07852/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1911.07852","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1911.07852v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1911.07852","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"RZPD7XTN5YOS","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"RZPD7XTN","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":8,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12526","citing_title":"Multi-entropy in heavy local quenches","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04470","citing_title":"Multi-entropy in random tensor networks","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00210","citing_title":"Constraints on four-party entanglement in holography","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00210","citing_title":"Constraints on four-party entanglement in holography","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2212.11740","citing_title":"Separability and entanglement of resonating valence-bond states","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08209","citing_title":"Tripartite Correlation Signal from Multipartite Entanglement of Purification","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.00593","citing_title":"Genuine multientropy, dihedral invariants and Lifshitz theory","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10583","citing_title":"The Junction Law for Multipartite Entanglement in Confining Holographic Backgrounds","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RZPD7XTN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/RZPD7XTN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1911.07852&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/RZPD7XTN5YOSPH4V4FE2AYWKPT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:04:07.285669+00:00"}