{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH","short_pith_number":"pith:S2BDKR6Q","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"96823547d05f0bc5473cd9541cc5d779cd3729154e04ad63dc8b6c9a0c801ad3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.11173","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Author revisions act as signals to improve LLM-generated responses to peer reviews","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iryna Gurevych, Qian Ruan","submitted_at":"2026-01-19T14:07:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Author response (rebuttal) writing is a critical stage of scientific peer review that demands substantial author effort. In practice, authors possess domain expertise, author-only information, and response strategies - concrete forms of author expertise and intent - and seek NLP assistance that integrates these signals into author response generation (ARG). Yet this author-in-the-loop paradigm lacks formal NLP formulation and systematic study: no dataset provides fine-grained author signals, existing ARG work lacks author inputs and controls, and no evaluation measures response reflection of a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.11173","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-01-19T14:07:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"790ab80901b5de8d6ca188628403c6519ec28f777960dae8727ce5ab585c4a4e","abstract_canon_sha256":"a6277b8a6f129bb57f25b37f8fca532e20e1b89f34ca163a5e06f8e39338dfb1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.298354Z","signature_b64":"O69duBBDTBE1vf7G+bTxA0uMzMsMTAUGUc+wMIa606Ue1AdmNp1bzFmJLVJFJn4EfsSvdzCXdRjZ1GrlP4uiBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"96823547d05f0bc5473cd9541cc5d779cd3729154e04ad63dc8b6c9a0c801ad3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297462Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297462Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Author revisions act as signals to improve LLM-generated responses to peer reviews","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iryna Gurevych, Qian Ruan","submitted_at":"2026-01-19T14:07:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Author response (rebuttal) writing is a critical stage of scientific peer review that demands substantial author effort. In practice, authors possess domain expertise, author-only information, and response strategies - concrete forms of author expertise and intent - and seek NLP assistance that integrates these signals into author response generation (ARG). Yet this author-in-the-loop paradigm lacks formal NLP formulation and systematic study: no dataset provides fine-grained author signals, existing ARG work lacks author inputs and controls, and no evaluation measures response reflection of a"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Experiments with SOTA LLMs demonstrate the benefits of author input and evaluation-guided refinement, the impact of input specificity on response quality, and controllability-quality trade-offs.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That paper revisions serve as reliable proxies for author signals and that the collected triplets capture genuine author expertise and intent without systematic bias from revision practices.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Introduces Re3Align dataset of review-response-revision triplets, REspGen author-in-the-loop generation framework, and REspEval multi-metric suite for controllable peer-review response generation.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Author revisions act as signals to improve LLM-generated responses to peer reviews","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"bcc015ee8450582cc578b48b28cc3df25a2b6a1e4efe9b29dd65cc2f5e560c80"},"source":{"id":"2602.11173","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"b448b29b-c1ed-4ba2-9d23-80236a754416","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-16T13:02:41.375119Z","strongest_claim":"Experiments with SOTA LLMs demonstrate the benefits of author input and evaluation-guided refinement, the impact of input specificity on response quality, and controllability-quality trade-offs.","one_line_summary":"Introduces Re3Align dataset of review-response-revision triplets, REspGen author-in-the-loop generation framework, and REspEval multi-metric suite for controllable peer-review response generation.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That paper revisions serve as reliable proxies for author signals and that the collected triplets capture genuine author expertise and intent without systematic bias from revision practices.","pith_extraction_headline":"Author revisions act as signals to improve LLM-generated responses to peer reviews"},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.11173/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.11173","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.11173v3","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.11173","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S2BDKR6QL4F4","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ4","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S2BDKR6Q","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18661","citing_title":"AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide","ref_index":163,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S2BDKR6Q"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S2BDKR6Q","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.11173&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S2BDKR6QL4F4KRZ43FKBZROXPH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:25.297587+00:00"}