{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP","short_pith_number":"pith:S3Y5NS4T","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"96f1d6cb9360faeb454b59df6560a2bbc8f9a7c945f9ac5822aac559904fcb43","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.12880","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Clustered Mallows Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Luiza S.C. Piancastelli, Nial Friel","submitted_at":"2024-03-19T16:25:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rankings are a type of preference elicitation that arise in experiments where assessors arrange items, for example, in decreasing order of utility. Orderings of n items labelled {1,...,n} denoted are permutations that reflect strict preferences. For a number of reasons, strict preferences can be unrealistic assumptions for real data. For example, when items share common traits it may be reasonable to attribute them equal ranks. Also, there can be different importance attributions to decisions that form the ranking. In a situation with, for example, a large number of items, an assessor may wish"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.12880","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-03-19T16:25:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"805e3392ecae5f58937be0e3503d54062ce093d3e68c4c8bd450b097444fa062","abstract_canon_sha256":"67fcc09438fa2dd4a438d9d0de50b50b408132632ef47e8b64f460018ec258ae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971968Z","signature_b64":"V7ntR2whHQ3zaDpnjCMEvdfWxReHDOENiVKPtfjyyu/5GTNYzWVQVwxW4F3SLbM/BwRmqHRdnMotO0M6AdYTDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"96f1d6cb9360faeb454b59df6560a2bbc8f9a7c945f9ac5822aac559904fcb43","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971450Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971450Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Clustered Mallows Model","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Luiza S.C. Piancastelli, Nial Friel","submitted_at":"2024-03-19T16:25:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rankings are a type of preference elicitation that arise in experiments where assessors arrange items, for example, in decreasing order of utility. Orderings of n items labelled {1,...,n} denoted are permutations that reflect strict preferences. For a number of reasons, strict preferences can be unrealistic assumptions for real data. For example, when items share common traits it may be reasonable to attribute them equal ranks. Also, there can be different importance attributions to decisions that form the ranking. In a situation with, for example, a large number of items, an assessor may wish"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.12880","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.12880/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.12880","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.12880v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.12880","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S3Y5NS4TMD5O","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKL","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S3Y5NS4T","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.26949","citing_title":"Bayesian Plackett--Luce latent block models for ranked data","ref_index":100,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S3Y5NS4T"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S3Y5NS4T","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.12880&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S3Y5NS4TMD5OWRKLLHPWKYFCXP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:58:08.971506+00:00"}