{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:S4SNUP32FVX6ARDWVPTXVAJM5L","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":4,"valid_event_count":4,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":1,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"37050937aab75db850e396ecef1a3d0295c3147c75de9541753da29dd01feb09","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T14:36:17Z","title_canon_sha256":"9eafafee9d24ce413bd494ffbb23dbd52b90d2bb8ea578fcc20faf2bfab85618"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13601","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13601","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13601v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13601","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S4SNUP32FVX6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S4SNUP32FVX6ARDW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S4SNUP32","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:f591cbfb5880125c84ab752c15a29242b74612d390228a6fe13eb69e86827182","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We mathematically prove the consistency of the Rankzzy for any admissible configuration selected by stakeholders. The evaluation conducted indicates a reduced computational cost in large-scale value-based decision-making problems and a strong rank performance regarding existing approaches when employing the aggregation via Pythagorean means."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the fuzzy domain of decision variables together with the score function can faithfully encode both quantitative and qualitative criteria without loss of information or introduction of new bias that would invalidate the unweighted generalization."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"FUW-VBDM reframes value-based decision making as unweighted optimization over a fuzzy score domain, solved via the Rankzzy method whose consistency is proven for any admissible stakeholder configuration, with lower computational cost than weighted baselines."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Unweighted fuzzy ranking proves consistent for value-based decisions without arbitrary weights."}],"snapshot_sha256":"70901d69520852f9dca8f969aef2dae0b9ecb2b8a8756a76a882d213bbe58377"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"d1aa374bf48ce5e08ada8ad21fed89702c773628e2a2ffeb87d9b7e1d5565d58"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"As intelligent systems are increasingly implemented in our society to make autonomous decisions, their commitment to human values raises serious concerns. Their alignment with human values remains a critical challenge because it can jeopardise the integrity and security of citizens. For this reason, an innovative human-centred and values-driven approach to decision making is required. In this work, we introduce the Fuzzy-Unweighted Value-Based Decision Making (FUW-VBDM) framework, where agents incorporate both quantitative and qualitative criteria to generate human-centred decisions. We also a","authors_text":"Aar\\'on L\\'opez Garc\\'ia, Jose Such, Natalia Criado","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"headline":"Unweighted fuzzy ranking proves consistent for value-based decisions without arbitrary weights.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T14:36:17Z","title":"Unweighted ranking for value-based decision making with uncertainty"},"references":{"count":98,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":98,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"I. Kaliszewski and D. Podkopaev , keywords =. Simple additive weighting—A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods , journal =. 2016 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.","work_id":"56300fe6-6ebd-4580-b6ed-032128c6ff1f","year":2016},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Hwang, Ching-Lai and Yoon, Kwangsun , doi =","work_id":"80b07e07-93d8-4b5a-b5d8-f57356e2856d","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Triantaphyllou, Evangelos and Kovalerchuk, Boris and Mann, Lawrence and Knapp, Gerald M. , title=. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering , year=","work_id":"1f6433e7-1947-4e41-b593-fe9b3fc21026","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , publisher =","work_id":"567e398a-f0e4-4597-86d1-d1ac9c783275","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1002/9781118522516","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"Intelligent Decision Support Systems , booktitle =","work_id":"80622da3-2d81-44cf-8086-2a3fdf6459d9","year":null}],"snapshot_sha256":"ffba580745c6b7bc1e3bc75728b774c632c9f4a336b1c67d75d50c4119318e47"},"source":{"id":"2605.13601","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:11:52.090159Z","id":"89d31e21-5e80-4cd8-beb1-8a7f6852bf93","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"FUW-VBDM reframes value-based decision making as unweighted optimization over a fuzzy score domain, solved via the Rankzzy method whose consistency is proven for any admissible stakeholder configuration, with lower computational cost than weighted baselines.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Unweighted fuzzy ranking proves consistent for value-based decisions without arbitrary weights.","strongest_claim":"We mathematically prove the consistency of the Rankzzy for any admissible configuration selected by stakeholders. The evaluation conducted indicates a reduced computational cost in large-scale value-based decision-making problems and a strong rank performance regarding existing approaches when employing the aggregation via Pythagorean means.","weakest_assumption":"That the fuzzy domain of decision variables together with the score function can faithfully encode both quantitative and qualitative criteria without loss of information or introduction of new bias that would invalidate the unweighted generalization."}},"verdict_id":"89d31e21-5e80-4cd8-beb1-8a7f6852bf93"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:f8df688faf1a92efea731248150356f2a1641d5dbf02a28d0df977e8bf8098e6","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"37050937aab75db850e396ecef1a3d0295c3147c75de9541753da29dd01feb09","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T14:36:17Z","title_canon_sha256":"9eafafee9d24ce413bd494ffbb23dbd52b90d2bb8ea578fcc20faf2bfab85618"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13601","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"9724da3f7a2d6fe04476abe77a812cead12436ce8b5c4ac805d2171d246c00ee","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"9724da3f7a2d6fe04476abe77a812cead12436ce8b5c4ac805d2171d246c00ee","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22.924486Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22.924486Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"GNMlgM0comhJ7BElSRB4TXvoCa5PC/q22rg9q8HsPyX7XBSZHSo3Rdb9Pvk8ja0YvRsWAyHgqXLrNfOxIlavCw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:22.924890Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.13601","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[{"signer_id":"pith.science","event_type":"integrity_finding","target":"integrity","event_ids":["sha256:6e6d1a60e6253e4bf8b5e9365e4c417a8d0881ef3d9c4ac08badb4820ffa5168","sha256:7fc8db80c66fffefad978d06ed041251b9cfdb0414c739c9eb53b32177dbf086"]}],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:f8df688faf1a92efea731248150356f2a1641d5dbf02a28d0df977e8bf8098e6","sha256:f591cbfb5880125c84ab752c15a29242b74612d390228a6fe13eb69e86827182"],"state_sha256":"e2282d7807a7faf574a8cf8ab6b2471e0e3c7a4bb2b02222eb03748aeabca262"}