{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42","short_pith_number":"pith:S4YDPLDZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"973037ac796bf81a1af1462dc34fede6822dee9341b96d0fb6077c224fd12080","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.16032","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Physics of (good) LDPC Codes I. Gauging and dualities","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.stat-mech","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Tibor Rakovszky, Vedika Khemani","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T17:47:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Low-depth parity check (LDPC) codes are a paradigm of error correction that allow for spatially non-local interactions between (qu)bits, while still enforcing that each (qu)bit interacts only with finitely many others. On expander graphs, they can give rise to ``good codes'' that combine a finite encoding rate with an optimal scaling of the code distance, which governs the code's robustness against noise. Such codes have garnered much recent attention due to two breakthrough developments: the construction of good quantum LDPC codes and good locally testable classical LDPC codes, using similar "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.16032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T17:47:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cond-mat.stat-mech","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"f223b0c4fbdee0427480d38d32a49abeaa4c70644ce087bb52006be2194591b0","abstract_canon_sha256":"56f70b4877703ce2da6ae769cb52aa88d9f8367f35c219ea65b97c26c6a60517"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.065205Z","signature_b64":"RYwUv4IUyNQ1/84PQEhqgZX2DDjctOLK5Gswu3DisPwWhvn1juOy6nbs6t4oZdEJPRnb/XArcJQ46SMcC69zAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"973037ac796bf81a1af1462dc34fede6822dee9341b96d0fb6077c224fd12080","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064737Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064737Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Physics of (good) LDPC Codes I. Gauging and dualities","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.stat-mech","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Tibor Rakovszky, Vedika Khemani","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T17:47:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Low-depth parity check (LDPC) codes are a paradigm of error correction that allow for spatially non-local interactions between (qu)bits, while still enforcing that each (qu)bit interacts only with finitely many others. On expander graphs, they can give rise to ``good codes'' that combine a finite encoding rate with an optimal scaling of the code distance, which governs the code's robustness against noise. Such codes have garnered much recent attention due to two breakthrough developments: the construction of good quantum LDPC codes and good locally testable classical LDPC codes, using similar "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.16032","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.16032/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.16032","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.16032v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.16032","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S4YDPLDZNP4B","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXR","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S4YDPLDZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":7,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05664","citing_title":"Gauging the Spacetime Code","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.16250","citing_title":"Cups and Gates I: Cohomology invariants and logical quantum operations","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19298","citing_title":"Translation-invariant quantum low-density parity-check codes from compactified fracton models","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.19440","citing_title":"There and Back Again: A Gauging Nexus between Topological and Fracton Phases","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.04430","citing_title":"Symmetry-enriched topological order and quasifractonic behavior in $\\mathbb{Z}_N$ stabilizer codes","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.08711","citing_title":"Coupled-Layer Construction of Quantum Product Codes","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27363","citing_title":"Constructing Bulk Topological Orders via Layered Gauging","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S4YDPLDZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S4YDPLDZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.16032&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S4YDPLDZNP4BUGXRIYW4GT7N42/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:34.064795+00:00"}