{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE","short_pith_number":"pith:S5IUX4EG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"97514bf08658a65f62f390a3612f7cc11cf852370e3e5ef049d093c19ba72d4f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2312.04103","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Cheng Wang, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Ruixuan Li, Wei Liu, Yuankai Zhang, Zhiying Deng","submitted_at":"2023-12-07T07:37:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rationalization empowers deep learning models with self-explaining capabilities through a cooperative game, where a generator selects a semantically consistent subset of the input as a rationale, and a subsequent predictor makes predictions based on the selected rationale. In this paper, we discover that rationalization is prone to a problem named \\emph{rationale shift}, which arises from the algorithmic bias of the cooperative game. Rationale shift refers to a situation where the semantics of the selected rationale may deviate from the original input, but the predictor still produces accurate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2312.04103","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2023-12-07T07:37:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"7c01b75aed22143f5ecd33d17fab6990f27edabd26f03d4865fcc349886484ce","abstract_canon_sha256":"c55241b9a1049e778626c5fa0e96c6f709e62800a2bc5de21f4d0165ff91c774"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602999Z","signature_b64":"A4QDRwdDu4z5tp1YV0LAfvHjSFRmvkVVgqQEfnlyVIMR3CdZwp8tej6u5jVtzPUx6J5nyvrLHJ+Xlq8SUj1sBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"97514bf08658a65f62f390a3612f7cc11cf852370e3e5ef049d093c19ba72d4f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602524Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602524Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Cheng Wang, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang, Ruixuan Li, Wei Liu, Yuankai Zhang, Zhiying Deng","submitted_at":"2023-12-07T07:37:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rationalization empowers deep learning models with self-explaining capabilities through a cooperative game, where a generator selects a semantically consistent subset of the input as a rationale, and a subsequent predictor makes predictions based on the selected rationale. In this paper, we discover that rationalization is prone to a problem named \\emph{rationale shift}, which arises from the algorithmic bias of the cooperative game. Rationale shift refers to a situation where the semantics of the selected rationale may deviate from the original input, but the predictor still produces accurate"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2312.04103","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2312.04103/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2312.04103","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2312.04103v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.04103","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S5IUX4EGLCTF","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXT","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S5IUX4EG","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.10312","citing_title":"Interlocking-free Selective Rationalization Through Genetic-based Learning","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S5IUX4EG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S5IUX4EG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2312.04103&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S5IUX4EGLCTF6YXTSCRWCL34YE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:24:21.602579+00:00"}