{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR","short_pith_number":"pith:S6YS67FV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"97b12f7cb58abf9967b5b9905bddff3c5fc92d87ac234ddeefb1b5e0cb20768c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.17975","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Simulation-Based Inference Benchmark for Weak Lensing Cosmology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adrian E. Bayer, Alexandre Boucaud, Denise Lanzieri, Eric Aubourg, Fran\\c{c}ois Lanusse, Gilles Louppe, Justine Zeghal, The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration","submitted_at":"2024-09-26T15:50:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard cosmological analysis, which relies on two-point statistics, fails to extract the full information of the data. This limits our ability to constrain with precision cosmological parameters. Thus, recent years have seen a paradigm shift from analytical likelihood-based to simulation-based inference. However, such methods require a large number of costly simulations. We focus on full-field inference, considered the optimal form of inference. Our objective is to benchmark several ways of conducting full-field inference to gain insight into the number of simulations required for each metho"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.17975","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-09-26T15:50:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"51f8748d505a21e6021fd17430f2899336178a8494c2b7fc753a44de2da2bac3","abstract_canon_sha256":"731dafe817714083aced5a5e0d19a349dbe82e04ec6705c328760cad48f209c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.338288Z","signature_b64":"tzcaFQ9Q2m9m3vfKYDRFE7SXi0sdhDSSApy7N1cl1hN9bnZ9+gTcxBLx5oyaZpBdLvPBn5jOh8M6JIMN1JSwCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"97b12f7cb58abf9967b5b9905bddff3c5fc92d87ac234ddeefb1b5e0cb20768c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337753Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337753Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Simulation-Based Inference Benchmark for Weak Lensing Cosmology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adrian E. Bayer, Alexandre Boucaud, Denise Lanzieri, Eric Aubourg, Fran\\c{c}ois Lanusse, Gilles Louppe, Justine Zeghal, The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration","submitted_at":"2024-09-26T15:50:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard cosmological analysis, which relies on two-point statistics, fails to extract the full information of the data. This limits our ability to constrain with precision cosmological parameters. Thus, recent years have seen a paradigm shift from analytical likelihood-based to simulation-based inference. However, such methods require a large number of costly simulations. We focus on full-field inference, considered the optimal form of inference. Our objective is to benchmark several ways of conducting full-field inference to gain insight into the number of simulations required for each metho"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.17975","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.17975/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.17975","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.17975v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.17975","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S6YS67FVRK7Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5V","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S6YS67FV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.21392","citing_title":"Sensitivity of Weak Lensing Surveys to Gravitational Waves from Inspiraling Supermassive Black Hole Binaries","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S6YS67FV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S6YS67FV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.17975&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S6YS67FVRK7ZSZ5VXGIFXXP7HR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:19.337809+00:00"}