{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I","short_pith_number":"pith:S7MV5XOW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"97d95eddd6a7b993f333e1b2b78695fa071cd805f8657accaf6c3d3e30738218","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.16672","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Tug of War Within: Mitigating the Fairness-Privacy Conflicts in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Chen Qian, Dongrui Liu, Jie Zhang, Jing Shao, Yong Liu","submitted_at":"2024-10-22T04:08:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ensuring awareness of fairness and privacy in Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical. Interestingly, we discover a counter-intuitive trade-off phenomenon that enhancing an LLM's privacy awareness through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) methods significantly decreases its fairness awareness with thousands of samples. To address this issue, inspired by the information theory, we introduce a training-free method to \\textbf{S}uppress the \\textbf{P}rivacy and fa\\textbf{I}rness coupled \\textbf{N}eurons (\\textbf{SPIN}), which theoretically and empirically decrease the mutual information between fairne"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.16672","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-10-22T04:08:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"84284a94cfbf49aa5161abe5018be381536bd081ddeb9f42f9e9d3697160f27e","abstract_canon_sha256":"88db9e4c0e947b87cf352263633127d1db71be15b4bd1ba7ff623c7df7350dde"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023632Z","signature_b64":"PfSH2sN0GnEiy3fyzDVa4je9yKqAVVJGcSxsuXae5apkFTBBP4KXPS/Nbe94kZIus+ropi8Vept+ozNcVBDdCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"97d95eddd6a7b993f333e1b2b78695fa071cd805f8657accaf6c3d3e30738218","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023157Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023157Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Tug of War Within: Mitigating the Fairness-Privacy Conflicts in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Chen Qian, Dongrui Liu, Jie Zhang, Jing Shao, Yong Liu","submitted_at":"2024-10-22T04:08:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ensuring awareness of fairness and privacy in Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical. Interestingly, we discover a counter-intuitive trade-off phenomenon that enhancing an LLM's privacy awareness through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) methods significantly decreases its fairness awareness with thousands of samples. To address this issue, inspired by the information theory, we introduce a training-free method to \\textbf{S}uppress the \\textbf{P}rivacy and fa\\textbf{I}rness coupled \\textbf{N}eurons (\\textbf{SPIN}), which theoretically and empirically decrease the mutual information between fairne"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.16672","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.16672/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.16672","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.16672v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.16672","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"S7MV5XOWU64Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"S7MV5XOW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.02867","citing_title":"Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoning","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S7MV5XOW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/S7MV5XOW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.16672&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/S7MV5XOWU64ZH4ZT4GZLPBUV7I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:14:50.023216+00:00"}