{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5","short_pith_number":"pith:SBNPV353","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"905afaefbb316fe90113a9dfabe4c187452e5dc1a5a3f0708af223aa3db811a9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.05479","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When models fail: an introduction to posterior predictive checks and model misspecification in gravitational-wave astronomy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"Eric Thrane, Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky","submitted_at":"2022-02-11T06:45:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bayesian inference is a powerful tool in gravitational-wave astronomy. It enables us to deduce the properties of merging compact-object binaries and to determine how these mergers are distributed as a population according to mass, spin, and redshift. As key results are increasingly derived using Bayesian inference, there is increasing scrutiny on Bayesian methods. In this review, we discuss the phenomenon of \\textit{model misspecification}, in which results obtained with Bayesian inference are misleading because of deficiencies in the assumed model(s). Such deficiencies can impede our inferenc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.05479","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","submitted_at":"2022-02-11T06:45:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"cc838aba7d51d851f78b4959ec819ba45848dc72fc720e63f082385bc7ff191c","abstract_canon_sha256":"4815d208d30a82b7e1d7783ca9a08535110ad5fd570eca2d58cf80b9ecc379c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.260088Z","signature_b64":"dDGw+pD9FUa1LMJe59OA2Hk3sxq9AVm1dK6lPgT88/xszI9nUEqlbHMS80w5d/5HtsVbrABZLVxcQJZMP6c5CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"905afaefbb316fe90113a9dfabe4c187452e5dc1a5a3f0708af223aa3db811a9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259620Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259620Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When models fail: an introduction to posterior predictive checks and model misspecification in gravitational-wave astronomy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"Eric Thrane, Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky","submitted_at":"2022-02-11T06:45:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bayesian inference is a powerful tool in gravitational-wave astronomy. It enables us to deduce the properties of merging compact-object binaries and to determine how these mergers are distributed as a population according to mass, spin, and redshift. As key results are increasingly derived using Bayesian inference, there is increasing scrutiny on Bayesian methods. In this review, we discuss the phenomenon of \\textit{model misspecification}, in which results obtained with Bayesian inference are misleading because of deficiencies in the assumed model(s). Such deficiencies can impede our inferenc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.05479","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.05479/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.05479","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.05479v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.05479","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SBNPV353GFX6","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SBNPV353GFX6SAIT","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SBNPV353","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21076","citing_title":"Population-level correlations in Bayesian statistics: an illustrative model for gravitational-wave astronomy","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20112","citing_title":"Gravitational-wave constraints on $H_0$ are robust to (putative) redshift evolution in the binary black hole mass spectrum at current sensitivity","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11282","citing_title":"Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06090","citing_title":"Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15885","citing_title":"Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SBNPV353"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SBNPV353","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.05479&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SBNPV353GFX6SAITVHP2XZGBQ5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:33.259676+00:00"}