{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS","short_pith_number":"pith:SCVKQSNT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"90aaa849b3e424449fcb0539abc2ceac9f515597d9094dbc28c3658cf2687fbf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2303.17102","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When is the estimated propensity score better? High-dimensional analysis and bias correction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Fangzhou Su, Martin J. Wainwright, Peng Ding, Wenlong Mou","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T02:19:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anecdotally, using an estimated propensity score is superior to the true propensity score in estimating the average treatment effect based on observational data. However, this claim comes with several qualifications: it holds only if propensity score model is correctly specified and the number of covariates $d$ is small relative to the sample size $n$. We revisit this phenomenon by studying the inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) estimator based on a logistic model with a diverging number of covariates. We first show that the IPW estimator based on the estimated propensity score is consis"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2303.17102","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T02:19:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5a19d14b97e88c6515cca5c8dc6df9f9ac8482787935b9a363ff19a1749ac36a","abstract_canon_sha256":"9d4b5638ca452f1d4f8f2a64c4e64f2d9769bf6edfd4db316b06df740b7aef15"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919900Z","signature_b64":"Q7XNDU2Ti4gnaxqyYVFNAb8yDYm6R5ACNtFs8P5IlV/H+utH/QXI1MdXfinNwYf9ETaAFLr3o9gOQhA2IBcTCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"90aaa849b3e424449fcb0539abc2ceac9f515597d9094dbc28c3658cf2687fbf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919442Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919442Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When is the estimated propensity score better? High-dimensional analysis and bias correction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Fangzhou Su, Martin J. Wainwright, Peng Ding, Wenlong Mou","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T02:19:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anecdotally, using an estimated propensity score is superior to the true propensity score in estimating the average treatment effect based on observational data. However, this claim comes with several qualifications: it holds only if propensity score model is correctly specified and the number of covariates $d$ is small relative to the sample size $n$. We revisit this phenomenon by studying the inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) estimator based on a logistic model with a diverging number of covariates. We first show that the IPW estimator based on the estimated propensity score is consis"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2303.17102","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2303.17102/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2303.17102","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2303.17102v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.17102","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SCVKQSNT4QSE","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6L","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SCVKQSNT","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.14051","citing_title":"Estimation of Treatment Effects in Extreme and Unobserved Data","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SCVKQSNT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SCVKQSNT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2303.17102&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SCVKQSNT4QSEJH6LAU42XQWOVS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:56:42.919497+00:00"}