{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I","short_pith_number":"pith:SDVDTBRB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"90ea3986217c62a29080f88e044348ea01088d57e9fa5e411e8e8f62693ff37d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.18077","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conservative Perception Models for Probabilistic Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.FL","authors_text":"Insup Lee, Ivan Ruchkin, Matthew Cleaveland, Oleg Sokolsky, Pengyuan Lu","submitted_at":"2025-03-23T13:58:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Verifying the behaviors of autonomous systems with learned perception components is a challenging problem due to the complexity of the perception and the uncertainty of operating environments. Probabilistic model checking is a powerful tool for providing guarantees on stochastic models of systems. However, constructing model-checkable models of black-box perception components for system-level mathematical guarantees has been an enduring challenge. In this paper, we propose a method for constructing provably conservative Interval Markov Decision Process (IMDP) models of closed-loop systems with"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.18077","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.FL","submitted_at":"2025-03-23T13:58:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"14a557e2f14323562576bf5d1d8e6989a1aa80e3332da07edd48398e71467fd8","abstract_canon_sha256":"7f3f609696b856e74dac9e63dd563bc2deae5f012d8e4792863f034245f81fde"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903730Z","signature_b64":"kR01/U0VfCwNmWn7o6LeZjb/YykJEfPh2KcJVEi5srnA37jxmAdj3w0E/rfDmDZps+d3Y8zJ9FfFXwcSv0SCAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"90ea3986217c62a29080f88e044348ea01088d57e9fa5e411e8e8f62693ff37d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903218Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903218Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conservative Perception Models for Probabilistic Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.FL","authors_text":"Insup Lee, Ivan Ruchkin, Matthew Cleaveland, Oleg Sokolsky, Pengyuan Lu","submitted_at":"2025-03-23T13:58:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Verifying the behaviors of autonomous systems with learned perception components is a challenging problem due to the complexity of the perception and the uncertainty of operating environments. Probabilistic model checking is a powerful tool for providing guarantees on stochastic models of systems. However, constructing model-checkable models of black-box perception components for system-level mathematical guarantees has been an enduring challenge. In this paper, we propose a method for constructing provably conservative Interval Markov Decision Process (IMDP) models of closed-loop systems with"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.18077","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.18077/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.18077","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.18077v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.18077","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SDVDTBRBPRRK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SDVDTBRB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.02893","citing_title":"Statistical-Symbolic Verification of Perception-Based Autonomous Systems using State-Dependent Conformal Prediction","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.14360","citing_title":"Digital Guardians: The Past and The Future of Cyber-Physical Resilience","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SDVDTBRB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SDVDTBRB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.18077&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SDVDTBRBPRRKFEEA7CHAIQ2I5I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:46.903287+00:00"}