{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55","short_pith_number":"pith:SE46FZAF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9139e2e4055b3cb64182d98a9bb899ef5a5bb70fa3e77c963c949b8792feabab","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.15516","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"In Pursuit of Predictive Models of Human Preferences Toward AI Teammates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Ho Chit Siu, Jaime D. Pe\\~na, Ross E. Allen, Yutai Zhou","submitted_at":"2025-01-31T22:10:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We seek measurable properties of AI agents that make them better or worse teammates from the subjective perspective of human collaborators. Our experiments use the cooperative card game Hanabi -- a common benchmark for AI-teaming research. We first evaluate AI agents on a set of objective metrics based on task performance, information theory, and game theory, which are measurable without human interaction. Next, we evaluate subjective human preferences toward AI teammates in a large-scale (N=241) human-AI teaming experiment. Finally, we correlate the AI-only objective metrics with the human su"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.15516","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-01-31T22:10:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ae344fa66d07655d0d283782b829902c791b81f853fc08dc82984c9ae8072d11","abstract_canon_sha256":"38b42107c4f6d0a8f7e07fe5e127b1192d7364439f7d7a94876d941b793e3d47"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890712Z","signature_b64":"1jKn9M866Iiin4QTbfcQu4dC4NBUjC1u7Vt5y3QyZ2iX98WRd3hTMCl44U3gTayROzwGhAb7sGURo6LFdSjgAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9139e2e4055b3cb64182d98a9bb899ef5a5bb70fa3e77c963c949b8792feabab","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890209Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890209Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"In Pursuit of Predictive Models of Human Preferences Toward AI Teammates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Ho Chit Siu, Jaime D. Pe\\~na, Ross E. Allen, Yutai Zhou","submitted_at":"2025-01-31T22:10:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We seek measurable properties of AI agents that make them better or worse teammates from the subjective perspective of human collaborators. Our experiments use the cooperative card game Hanabi -- a common benchmark for AI-teaming research. We first evaluate AI agents on a set of objective metrics based on task performance, information theory, and game theory, which are measurable without human interaction. Next, we evaluate subjective human preferences toward AI teammates in a large-scale (N=241) human-AI teaming experiment. Finally, we correlate the AI-only objective metrics with the human su"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.15516","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.15516/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.15516","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.15516v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.15516","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SE46FZAFLM6L","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SE46FZAF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24461","citing_title":"Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SE46FZAF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SE46FZAF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.15516&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SE46FZAFLM6LMQMC3GFJXOEZ55/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.890267+00:00"}