{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA","short_pith_number":"pith:SEXAAF7G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"912e0017e6c79bdc137da5f915df3a18389e5be3f995efe849d49f275eb865b3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2206.05675","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Survey on Uncertainty Reasoning and Quantification for Decision Making: Belief Theory Meets Deep Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Audun J{\\o}sang, Dong H. Jeong, Feng Chen, Jin-Hee Cho, Lance M. Kaplan, Qisheng Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xujiang Zhao, Zelin Wan, Zhen Guo","submitted_at":"2022-06-12T06:28:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"An in-depth understanding of uncertainty is the first step to making effective decisions under uncertainty. Deep/machine learning (ML/DL) has been hugely leveraged to solve complex problems involved with processing high-dimensional data. However, reasoning and quantifying different types of uncertainties to achieve effective decision-making have been much less explored in ML/DL than in other Artificial Intelligence (AI) domains. In particular, belief/evidence theories have been studied in KRR since the 1960s to reason and measure uncertainties to enhance decision-making effectiveness. We found"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2206.05675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2022-06-12T06:28:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"title_canon_sha256":"d81fd791fe4cadaa60b10ee164693c71dfebbe286849e79c1d071f0fcec8ad04","abstract_canon_sha256":"4664d1c28c37cb36926f5328bfea829746caefe9cb568f59a473127ed37f1de0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.325419Z","signature_b64":"zScjlK344b6ud4x7rmi9K26TIrlu4QO9OqFPm3XI14GKjYH05jW7BBfT+hMT7HwGdTRwkYNrkXCWNMIseXXwDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"912e0017e6c79bdc137da5f915df3a18389e5be3f995efe849d49f275eb865b3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324900Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324900Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Survey on Uncertainty Reasoning and Quantification for Decision Making: Belief Theory Meets Deep Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Audun J{\\o}sang, Dong H. Jeong, Feng Chen, Jin-Hee Cho, Lance M. Kaplan, Qisheng Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xujiang Zhao, Zelin Wan, Zhen Guo","submitted_at":"2022-06-12T06:28:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"An in-depth understanding of uncertainty is the first step to making effective decisions under uncertainty. Deep/machine learning (ML/DL) has been hugely leveraged to solve complex problems involved with processing high-dimensional data. However, reasoning and quantifying different types of uncertainties to achieve effective decision-making have been much less explored in ML/DL than in other Artificial Intelligence (AI) domains. In particular, belief/evidence theories have been studied in KRR since the 1960s to reason and measure uncertainties to enhance decision-making effectiveness. We found"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2206.05675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2206.05675/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2206.05675","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2206.05675v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2206.05675","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SEXAAF7GY6N5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SEXAAF7G","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27804","citing_title":"Methods for Uncertainty Representation in Risk Management: A Comparative Review and Decision-Oriented Framework","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SEXAAF7G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SEXAAF7G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2206.05675&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SEXAAF7GY6N5YE35UX4RLXZ2DA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:41.324965+00:00"}