{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI","short_pith_number":"pith:SF3FBS32","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"917650cb7a866bb6a2eafcacc657c3ba15d405343f10a8a4a6d02d024e06ec76","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.15993","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T15:41:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Arguments evoke emotions, influencing the effect of the argument itself. Not only the emotional intensity but also the category influence the argument's effects, for instance, the willingness to adapt stances. While binary emotionality has been studied in arguments, there is no work on discrete emotion categories (e.g., \"Anger\") in such data. To fill this gap, we crowdsource subjective annotations of emotion categories in a German argument corpus and evaluate automatic LLM-based labeling methods. Specifically, we compare three prompting strategies (zero-shot, one-shot, chain-of-thought) on thr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.15993","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T15:41:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bd42a04f5ccca5c29faed25776fcbbb829a0130a25c24dc150aa5e689e8a12b4","abstract_canon_sha256":"20d89c382827115a3230084b77283b5d6e872d6618468e34ed3197892c646b1e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.384059Z","signature_b64":"cZ6Eu51ZR+myigglMABCRJGyRJrEF9Pgm6VrveYyJljhR8foiJr/5auUmpvElw0Pi60gST6xOR/iOhz+cnfxBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"917650cb7a866bb6a2eafcacc657c3ba15d405343f10a8a4a6d02d024e06ec76","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383589Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383589Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T15:41:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Arguments evoke emotions, influencing the effect of the argument itself. Not only the emotional intensity but also the category influence the argument's effects, for instance, the willingness to adapt stances. While binary emotionality has been studied in arguments, there is no work on discrete emotion categories (e.g., \"Anger\") in such data. To fill this gap, we crowdsource subjective annotations of emotion categories in a German argument corpus and evaluate automatic LLM-based labeling methods. Specifically, we compare three prompting strategies (zero-shot, one-shot, chain-of-thought) on thr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.15993","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.15993/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.15993","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.15993v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.15993","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SF3FBS32QZV3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SF3FBS32","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.17409","citing_title":"Investigating Subjective Factors of Argument Strength: Storytelling, Emotions, and Hedging","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SF3FBS32"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SF3FBS32","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.15993&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SF3FBS32QZV3NIXK7SWMMV6DXI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:52:17.383641+00:00"}