{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O","short_pith_number":"pith:SHE5KJ56","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"91c9d527be15c375bf1d79494620dee3b12897c60244af9bad08954ee21279a8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2302.07180","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Respecting Boundaries: Theoretical Equivalence and Structure Beyond Dynamics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"James Read, William J. Wolf","submitted_at":"2023-02-14T16:45:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"A standard line in the contemporary philosophical literature has it that physical theories are equivalent only when they agree on their empirical content, where this empirical content is often understood as being encoded in the equations of motion of those theories. In this article, we question whether it is indeed the case that the empirical content of a theory is exhausted by its equations of motion, showing that (for example) considerations of boundary conditions play a key role in the empirical equivalence (or otherwise) of theories. Having argued for this, we show that philosophical claim"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2302.07180","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2023-02-14T16:45:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"38a38cb782e3e179693cafa8b4a64c80ecdc3fe54c3eb420c835e032b99b1583","abstract_canon_sha256":"cd91c7880056571038742105ca66875d30d3aeafcb7dca56de3ba467d924dbcf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.916214Z","signature_b64":"AYfZKcOBN5AVpxW5Mw8hKqbkQQzI5FWgs3DtKtULvDZgcBdf6M87Huh6Y+eqnLG9x9HUzl4iIjfWrWm2nVgkBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"91c9d527be15c375bf1d79494620dee3b12897c60244af9bad08954ee21279a8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915699Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915699Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Respecting Boundaries: Theoretical Equivalence and Structure Beyond Dynamics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"James Read, William J. Wolf","submitted_at":"2023-02-14T16:45:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"A standard line in the contemporary philosophical literature has it that physical theories are equivalent only when they agree on their empirical content, where this empirical content is often understood as being encoded in the equations of motion of those theories. In this article, we question whether it is indeed the case that the empirical content of a theory is exhausted by its equations of motion, showing that (for example) considerations of boundary conditions play a key role in the empirical equivalence (or otherwise) of theories. Having argued for this, we show that philosophical claim"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2302.07180","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2302.07180/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2302.07180","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2302.07180v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2302.07180","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SHE5KJ56CXBX","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SHE5KJ56","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.03936","citing_title":"Affine connections for Galilean and Carrollian structures: a unified perspective","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHE5KJ56"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHE5KJ56","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2302.07180&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SHE5KJ56CXBXLPY5PFEUMIG64O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:46:15.915764+00:00"}