{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L","short_pith_number":"pith:SHPT5DSN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"91df3e8e4df7e4aae11bd0db5e1da0eae3877fa87b3c577231ae84885085f795","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.13551","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are Effective Priors for Causal Graph Discovery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Mirco Musolesi, Stephen Hailes, Victor-Alexandru Darvariu","submitted_at":"2024-05-22T11:39:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Causal structure discovery from observations can be improved by integrating background knowledge provided by an expert to reduce the hypothesis space. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have begun to be considered as sources of prior information given the low cost of querying them relative to a human expert. In this work, firstly, we propose a set of metrics for assessing LLM judgments for causal graph discovery independently of the downstream algorithm. Secondly, we systematically study a set of prompting designs that allows the model to specify priors about the structure of the causal gr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.13551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-05-22T11:39:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"c546253b5ec517296a19dc5f623f0f3a68b1a9a9c8602051d060f1e369925c12","abstract_canon_sha256":"6e551dcfeec340cb3c488d8cf2e961597373c60f40c0acaea18b73dcaed475e6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.285098Z","signature_b64":"auIOUIvvP0xQ+RqQUh1RC7ZmF1ytX9Vys+IOWALp7C1se9U1CF5+Rbk+Hq1XkWmqV1BRznmG16vc5l7VD5Y7Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"91df3e8e4df7e4aae11bd0db5e1da0eae3877fa87b3c577231ae84885085f795","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284714Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284714Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large Language Models are Effective Priors for Causal Graph Discovery","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Mirco Musolesi, Stephen Hailes, Victor-Alexandru Darvariu","submitted_at":"2024-05-22T11:39:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Causal structure discovery from observations can be improved by integrating background knowledge provided by an expert to reduce the hypothesis space. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have begun to be considered as sources of prior information given the low cost of querying them relative to a human expert. In this work, firstly, we propose a set of metrics for assessing LLM judgments for causal graph discovery independently of the downstream algorithm. Secondly, we systematically study a set of prompting designs that allows the model to specify priors about the structure of the causal gr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.13551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.13551/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.13551","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.13551v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.13551","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SHPT5DSN67SK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SHPT5DSN67SKVYI3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SHPT5DSN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23608","citing_title":"Causal Discovery in the Era of Agents","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19264","citing_title":"Structured Inference with Large Language Gibbs","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10358","citing_title":"KG-SoftMAP: Soft Knowledge-Graph Priors for Bayesian Network Structure Learning from Sparse Discrete Data","ref_index":95,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05330","citing_title":"A Model of Multi-turn Human Persuadability Using Probabilistic Belief Tracing","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23414","citing_title":"When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":110,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHPT5DSN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHPT5DSN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.13551&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SHPT5DSN67SKVYI32DNV4HNA5L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:22:04.284769+00:00"}