{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6","short_pith_number":"pith:SHXKDPFB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"91eea1bca1b96c82caa3253aa69c2eb7a1ee67987ef071b2ca5eb5722d92be9b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2206.05330","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Gender Gap in Scholarly Self-Promotion on Social Media","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Daniel M. Romero, Em\\H{o}ke-\\'Agnes Horv\\'at, Hao Peng, Misha Teplitskiy","submitted_at":"2022-06-10T19:10:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Self-promotion in science is ubiquitous but may not be exercised equally by men and women. Research on self-promotion in other domains suggests that, due to bias in self-assessment and adverse reactions to non-gender-conforming behaviors (``pushback''), women tend to self-promote less often than men. We test whether this pattern extends to scholars by examining self-promotion over six years using 23M Tweets about 2.8M research papers by 3.5M authors. Overall, women are about 28% less likely than men to self-promote their papers even after accounting for important confounds, and this gap has gr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2206.05330","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2022-06-10T19:10:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"9e63257a63ea8e6717ba08d9c6ff909b6bc9fec98be34698fd8958d561dc6131","abstract_canon_sha256":"a26b987f4a35b4390b262be851a079007505d72e6161c695171bcc7e11819fe2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.034213Z","signature_b64":"ok7h5N4aM3PzwTriVNVw/wvCUICK5Pn+g7gSJrkQzvcnSNuA/yPrW4Z3u9aNIeJ42yTHWvt49nMyDJ3OZARKDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"91eea1bca1b96c82caa3253aa69c2eb7a1ee67987ef071b2ca5eb5722d92be9b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033726Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033726Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Gender Gap in Scholarly Self-Promotion on Social Media","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Daniel M. Romero, Em\\H{o}ke-\\'Agnes Horv\\'at, Hao Peng, Misha Teplitskiy","submitted_at":"2022-06-10T19:10:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Self-promotion in science is ubiquitous but may not be exercised equally by men and women. Research on self-promotion in other domains suggests that, due to bias in self-assessment and adverse reactions to non-gender-conforming behaviors (``pushback''), women tend to self-promote less often than men. We test whether this pattern extends to scholars by examining self-promotion over six years using 23M Tweets about 2.8M research papers by 3.5M authors. Overall, women are about 28% less likely than men to self-promote their papers even after accounting for important confounds, and this gap has gr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2206.05330","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2206.05330/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2206.05330","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2206.05330v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2206.05330","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SHXKDPFBXFWI","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVD","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SHXKDPFB","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHXKDPFB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SHXKDPFB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2206.05330&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SHXKDPFBXFWIFSVDEU5KNHBOW6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:53.033783+00:00"}