{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC","short_pith_number":"pith:SI73R6PR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"923fb8f9f1e9f7faafa77f7068049c589d22f25d12720a19121bd36b8ef821bf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1706.07196","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Community's Perspective on the Status and Future of Peer Review in Software Engineering","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Daniel Graziotin, Daniel M\\'endez Fern\\'andez, Lutz Prechelt","submitted_at":"2017-06-22T07:50:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: Pre-publication peer review of scientific articles is considered a key element of the research process in software engineering, yet it is often perceived as not to work fully well.\n  Objective: We aim at understanding the perceptions of and attitudes towards peer review of authors and reviewers at one of software engineering's most prestigious venues, the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).\n  Method: We invited 932 ICSE 2014/15/16 authors and reviewers to participate in a survey with 10 closed and 9 open questions.\n  Results: We present a multitude of results, suc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1706.07196","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2017-06-22T07:50:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.DL"],"title_canon_sha256":"446ec095928be09ecbeb536acc0d50e98200ea659b8105b38d142fa4340ea702","abstract_canon_sha256":"d8a51b1455b8ebcdfb073e9cb1efaa0c55af3570fcea4d976528f09bf1df28d3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.812487Z","signature_b64":"9S8J7k/DKMbKOJKwaSm8UuEzPHL3D4HDvtFt1U6AWEI5GLkA/QWgLWN/+fuZSl0dZOvO6DoG6Z0Btubyn2aHAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"923fb8f9f1e9f7faafa77f7068049c589d22f25d12720a19121bd36b8ef821bf","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811797Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811797Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Community's Perspective on the Status and Future of Peer Review in Software Engineering","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Daniel Graziotin, Daniel M\\'endez Fern\\'andez, Lutz Prechelt","submitted_at":"2017-06-22T07:50:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: Pre-publication peer review of scientific articles is considered a key element of the research process in software engineering, yet it is often perceived as not to work fully well.\n  Objective: We aim at understanding the perceptions of and attitudes towards peer review of authors and reviewers at one of software engineering's most prestigious venues, the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).\n  Method: We invited 932 ICSE 2014/15/16 authors and reviewers to participate in a survey with 10 closed and 9 open questions.\n  Results: We present a multitude of results, suc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1706.07196","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1706.07196","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811907+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1706.07196v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811907+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1706.07196","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811907+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SI73R6PR5H37","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:43.269735+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SI73R6PR5H37VL5H","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:43.269735+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SI73R6PR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:43.269735+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SI73R6PR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SI73R6PR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1706.07196&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SI73R6PR5H37VL5HP5YGQBE4LC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811907+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:50.811907+00:00"}