{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV","short_pith_number":"pith:SJHWIBEU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"924f6404940e99f8b6142adf94f2ba5577e5d138304f2b5fba6f654061805be4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.01056","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Diagnosing the role of observable distribution shift in scientific replications","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Dominik Rothenh\\\"ausler, Kevin Guo, Ying Jin","submitted_at":"2023-09-03T02:26:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many researchers have identified distribution shift as a likely contributor to the reproducibility crisis in behavioral and biomedical sciences. The idea is that if treatment effects vary across individual characteristics and experimental contexts, then studies conducted in different populations will estimate different average effects. This paper uses ``generalizability\" methods to quantify how much of the effect size discrepancy between an original study and its replication can be explained by distribution shift on observed unit-level characteristics. More specifically, we decompose this disc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.01056","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2023-09-03T02:26:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"fadb18541332e1586bbd9db050428b26abb076c18c221c962f1c4cecc7c41b6e","abstract_canon_sha256":"41485ae74f4c20bccbb01ff6242ea821923bc24a56504a5affc7cc499d4390f5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587988Z","signature_b64":"bm7ck+d8daOERPqpPFE8yV11qmIF8CArEZmWvTNuaQSs1WjYsCC3OqNqf8gAqZbLH740C7aYjaH0kVSsNy3gDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"924f6404940e99f8b6142adf94f2ba5577e5d138304f2b5fba6f654061805be4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587579Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587579Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Diagnosing the role of observable distribution shift in scientific replications","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Dominik Rothenh\\\"ausler, Kevin Guo, Ying Jin","submitted_at":"2023-09-03T02:26:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many researchers have identified distribution shift as a likely contributor to the reproducibility crisis in behavioral and biomedical sciences. The idea is that if treatment effects vary across individual characteristics and experimental contexts, then studies conducted in different populations will estimate different average effects. This paper uses ``generalizability\" methods to quantify how much of the effect size discrepancy between an original study and its replication can be explained by distribution shift on observed unit-level characteristics. More specifically, we decompose this disc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.01056","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.01056/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.01056","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.01056v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.01056","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SJHWIBEUB2M7","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SJHWIBEU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.01191","citing_title":"Uncovering Bias Mechanisms in Observational Studies","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJHWIBEU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJHWIBEU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.01056&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SJHWIBEUB2M7RNQUFLPZJ4V2KV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:47:31.587635+00:00"}