{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O","short_pith_number":"pith:SJOFFRX4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"925c52c6fc2bc69e288a2e0887040cd3a2435211fc10625909aa02c798d08cac","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2008.03261","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Matthew Kirk","submitted_at":"2020-08-07T16:45:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is a newly emerging tension between determinations of $V_{us}$ from different sources (known as the Cabibbo anomaly), which is clearly demonstrated by the new $R(V_{us})$ observable. We explore this observable from the perspective of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory and show there is a discrepancy between $R(V_{us})$ and existing electroweak precision observables (EWPO) in a simple single operator dominated scenario. We explore all possible single particle extensions of the Standard Model that can generate the Cabibbo anomaly effect and show how they cannot reconcile the current"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2008.03261","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-08-07T16:45:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"58fa3fc110dd4292b7b8b5af37b5e6441f0f382a63f5cd7ae4cbba01600aecfb","abstract_canon_sha256":"498c60595de59cf1998938bc82aa1b38290e95334bfaa1eff691cd11b28e8dc4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303803Z","signature_b64":"2Jdjuzqihp3iPPzKjON7v7T3bpzQ+IOR5ucPYU0sBoyK8FTsHJxd/zvxm381WCECx34MMtRGlp3c8/HL6pWfAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"925c52c6fc2bc69e288a2e0887040cd3a2435211fc10625909aa02c798d08cac","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303250Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303250Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Matthew Kirk","submitted_at":"2020-08-07T16:45:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is a newly emerging tension between determinations of $V_{us}$ from different sources (known as the Cabibbo anomaly), which is clearly demonstrated by the new $R(V_{us})$ observable. We explore this observable from the perspective of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory and show there is a discrepancy between $R(V_{us})$ and existing electroweak precision observables (EWPO) in a simple single operator dominated scenario. We explore all possible single particle extensions of the Standard Model that can generate the Cabibbo anomaly effect and show how they cannot reconcile the current"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2008.03261","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2008.03261/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2008.03261","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2008.03261v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.03261","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SJOFFRX4FPDJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEK","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SJOFFRX4","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.22383","citing_title":"Complete one-loop QED corrections to $D_s^+$ leptonic decays and impact on the CKM unitarity test","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJOFFRX4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJOFFRX4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2008.03261&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SJOFFRX4FPDJ4KEKFYEIOBAM2O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:13:48.303305+00:00"}