{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4","short_pith_number":"pith:SJVYUOFN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"926b8a38ad9f6e4076c64750b69861af3204e53b9d23168081ec9b2ee044dff3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2008.08517","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Competing Persuaders in Zero-Sum Games","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Dilip Ravindran, Zhihan Cui","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T15:52:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study Bayesian Persuasion with multiple senders who have access to conditionally independent experiments (and possibly others). Senders have zero-sum preferences over information revealed. We characterize when any set of states can be pooled in equilibrium and when all equilibria are fully revealing. The state is fully revealed in every equilibrium if and only if sender utility functions are `globally nonlinear'. With two states, this is equivalent to some sender having nontrivial preferences. The upshot is that `most' zero-sum sender preferences result in full revelation. We explore what c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2008.08517","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.TH","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T15:52:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3d7b9ecf09a659d1545cbd535cfa0a2668067f6d76821f58a0cb4d377a513f4b","abstract_canon_sha256":"9f1d36e29a1bb5de3dbe469eaefbc8399a90972e26732b8d4a96dba5030b75a3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200801Z","signature_b64":"6V6Jyf8Fv/oddQnQScTeQu4PTJTgYe9LE8s9kpewx5qbZJ04Yt9xh5Cw6QXzJuHnK6Cnf+eBUxxjPaEvIIgLBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"926b8a38ad9f6e4076c64750b69861af3204e53b9d23168081ec9b2ee044dff3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200374Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200374Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Competing Persuaders in Zero-Sum Games","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Dilip Ravindran, Zhihan Cui","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T15:52:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study Bayesian Persuasion with multiple senders who have access to conditionally independent experiments (and possibly others). Senders have zero-sum preferences over information revealed. We characterize when any set of states can be pooled in equilibrium and when all equilibria are fully revealing. The state is fully revealed in every equilibrium if and only if sender utility functions are `globally nonlinear'. With two states, this is equivalent to some sender having nontrivial preferences. The upshot is that `most' zero-sum sender preferences result in full revelation. We explore what c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2008.08517","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2008.08517/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2008.08517","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2008.08517v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.08517","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SJVYUOFNT5XE","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WG","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SJVYUOFN","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08675","citing_title":"Multi-Sender Bayesian Persuasion with Imperfect Information","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03527","citing_title":"Algorithmic Information Design for Searchers with Uncertain Alternatives","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJVYUOFN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SJVYUOFN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2008.08517&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SJVYUOFNT5XEA5WGI5ILNGDBV4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:31:10.200431+00:00"}