{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N","short_pith_number":"pith:SKFNQR3R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"928ad847716d116fbca09f22c67b9ef3686169d010c1f27e14a10c0ece28b45d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.05419","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Anqi Zhang, Aurojit Panda, Chen Zhao, He He, Jane Pan, Jinyang Li, Yulin Chen","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T18:42:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning models have achieved remarkable performance on tasks like math and logical reasoning thanks to their ability to search during reasoning. However, they still suffer from overthinking, often performing unnecessary reasoning steps even after reaching the correct answer. This raises the question: can models evaluate the correctness of their intermediate answers during reasoning? In this work, we study whether reasoning models encode information about answer correctness through probing the model's hidden states. The resulting probe can verify intermediate answers with high accuracy and pr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.05419","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T18:42:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"68102a602a15e26d0ae82cac5aeb7474374edbe3a33527be8383e1367c1f4d25","abstract_canon_sha256":"10e24de9756e678399295047bc3cc99f9ebc1e0eb5063812b696098225d70c22"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.123003Z","signature_b64":"8u8mMUg1Hf2oL2fEWP1zYu1f9C/NXkdJb3tZaWlc1ggQzLmoJO9pkjZSs/gd8o1cn8KyK+kbLTtNpW/LPXspCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"928ad847716d116fbca09f22c67b9ef3686169d010c1f27e14a10c0ece28b45d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122593Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122593Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Anqi Zhang, Aurojit Panda, Chen Zhao, He He, Jane Pan, Jinyang Li, Yulin Chen","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T18:42:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reasoning models have achieved remarkable performance on tasks like math and logical reasoning thanks to their ability to search during reasoning. However, they still suffer from overthinking, often performing unnecessary reasoning steps even after reaching the correct answer. This raises the question: can models evaluate the correctness of their intermediate answers during reasoning? In this work, we study whether reasoning models encode information about answer correctness through probing the model's hidden states. The resulting probe can verify intermediate answers with high accuracy and pr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.05419","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.05419/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.05419","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.05419v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.05419","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SKFNQR3RNUIW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFA","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SKFNQR3R","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":25,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22953","citing_title":"Plans Don't Persist: Why Context Management Is Load Bearing for LLM Agents","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22936","citing_title":"When Agents Commit Too Soon: Diagnosing Premature Commitment in LLM Agents","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22798","citing_title":"Does the Same Token Mean the Same State? MoE Routing as Signal for Reasoning Control","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18089","citing_title":"From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning","ref_index":111,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11599","citing_title":"When is Your LLM Steerable?","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03102","citing_title":"Small RL Controller, Large Language Model: RL-Guided Adaptive Sampling for Test-Time Scaling","ref_index":93,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23488","citing_title":"Do Prompt-Elicited Trajectories Reflect Training-Time Reward Hacking? A Systematic Study on Monitoring Training-Time Reward Hacking in Code Generation","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25864","citing_title":"When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27712","citing_title":"Prefix-Safe Bayesian Belief Tracking for LLM Reasoning Reliability:Separating Calibration from Ranking","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17890","citing_title":"Dynamic Rollout Editing for Reducing Overthinking in RL-Trained Reasoning Models","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07021","citing_title":"Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversight","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10893","citing_title":"Grounded or Guessing? LVLM Confidence Estimation via Blind-Image Contrastive Ranking","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.26522","citing_title":"Entropy After </Think> for reasoning model early exiting","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.03814","citing_title":"Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.20338","citing_title":"Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08083","citing_title":"LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10893","citing_title":"Grounded or Guessing? LVLM Confidence Estimation via Blind-Image Contrastive Ranking","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09502","citing_title":"Hidden Error Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: The Signal Is Diagnostic, Not Causal","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23488","citing_title":"Do Prompt-Elicited Trajectories Reflect Training-Time Reward Hacking? A Systematic Study on Monitoring Training-Time Reward Hacking in Code Generation","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01853","citing_title":"Spatiotemporal Hidden-State Dynamics as a Signature of Internal Reasoning in Large Language Models","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07021","citing_title":"Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversight","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08083","citing_title":"LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06756","citing_title":"How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs' Judgment of Answer Factuality","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15726","citing_title":"LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21057","citing_title":"TRACES: Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost-Efficient Early-Stopping","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKFNQR3R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKFNQR3R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.05419&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SKFNQR3RNUIW7PFAT4RMM6466N/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:42.122651+00:00"}